Do you think Arnhem Checkpoint could be a 2v2 map?

Arnhem Checkpoint enters the 2v2 rotation:

Option	Distribution	Votes
Yay!	45%
Nay!	18%
With changes, maybe.	36%

If the map is included...

Option	Distribution	Votes
Another map should be excluded. [which one(s)?]	29%
Just add it up.	71%

Total votes: 39

VOTE!

ABSTAIN

Posts: 543

Title self-explanatory. Do you think there are other 1v1 maps that could enter as well?

Reasoning: Arnhem Checkpoint is one of my favorite maps, but is kinda large. I think it has room for a 2v2 - hell, if Crossing can hold, why couldn't it?

Thoughts?

Posts: 955

Agreed
I mean, its already wider than most of 2vs2 maps

And toss out both versions of Moscow. That one is just

Also, Arnhem first needs a rebalance too, though.
North is massively disadvantaged

A small rescaling, to bring the northern base equally close to mid as the southern one is, would be a good start, then one can see if some of the buildings need a repositioning too

Posts: 261

I think there should be some adjustments made to be the southern church in this map. This building is too durable, and there are too much bushes around it. Last time one USF player put a squad of flame thrower AE inside building, and I really have no good way to drive it out as a OKW player.

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

are you suggesting it should be a 1v1 & 2v2 map or remove it from 1v1 and add it to 2v2

Posts: 543

13 Feb 2019, 03:34 AMWhiteFlash

are you suggesting it should be a 1v1 & 2v2 map or remove it from 1v1 and add it to 2v2

I think it should be kept as a 1v1 map as well. As I said, it’s one of my favorite maps, and I’m mainly a 1v1 player.

Posts: 3031 | Subs: 3

I have had this sugestion since years. I think it would be an amazing 2v2 map, it seems slightly too big for 1v1 tho. It might even work in 3v3 to be honest