UKF needs real buff , MAKE UKF GREAT AGAIN

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2019, 13:06 PMStug life

is this a joke ?

1 it's one of the most powerful upgrade there is, it does not increase cost of the unit, u don't pay munitions on each squad (like weapons) and reinforce cost stays the same

2 no at nades are good on RE if u want at nades on IS just pick the tank hunter doc

3 gamon bomb can be used by every IS, penal have to buy the upgrade each time

4 the MG does it's job, the main canon is AT only

5 cromwell is fine for his price, it has more pen than p4 and is super fast

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2019, 13:39 PMblvckdream

The problem with UKF is that they are still OP in early to mid-game against OKW on open maps while being complete shit against Ost. So how are you going to "balance" the faction? One of the few things that could be done is to give them a few more doctrines with early USF mortars so they can easier counter MGs.

Edit: I forgot to mention that J-Light spam completly reks UKF and there is very little that can be done against it because J-Lights counter sniper MG and infantry sections. Thank god the nerf for J-Lights is coming so this wont go on forever.

Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 08:12 AMThe amazing Chandler

Point 2) Agree 1000%.

Every other faction has it, why not UKF. No, they are not so different from the other factions to justify this.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2019, 23:57 PMStug life

but did u not just say "Factions are not mirrored, you need to take the context of what units shoots at."

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2019, 15:54 PMSigilli

I'm not great or good at this game, but I feel like the UKF needs:

Start the game with Royal Engineers;
AT Nades moved to the IS;
Sniper shorter time to shoot infantry;
Mortar unit on T1;

You could even move RE to tier 0 and get the AT nades behind T1 tech, I'd say.

Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 07:53 AMTheKingTiger1

1 ==> it costs fuel (35) and it means this upgrade puts you 1 step back from bringing armor while enemy OST/OKW already has his armor out.

Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 07:43 AMTheKingTiger1

not really dude, test it you will see . maybe its only on table but in-game not really idk maybe its a bug . anyway it shouldn't be like that and needs fix/balance.

Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 07:53 AMTheKingTiger1

1 ==> it costs fuel (35) and it means this upgrade puts you 1 step back from bringing armor while enemy OST/OKW already has his armor out.

2 ==> you said doctorine while it shall be no doctorinal .

3 ==> everyone knows gammon bomb is shit but you LOL . just pay a bit attention to its time! ; its late game upgrade and it shall be useful and valuable.

4 ==> i think you haven't played UKF for even 1 time recently after patch. go test it and then write something.

5 ==> an other joke )

Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 09:02 AMKatitof

And you took that completely out of context and attempted... I don't even know what.
So let me put an example here for you:

What is more durable?

4 man squad or 6 man squad?
4 man squad has 60 DPS and 6 man squad has 20, they are fighting each other.
Alternatively, they have equal DPS, but 4 man squad has 0.8 received accuracy, but 6 man squad has 1.1 received accuracy, still fighting each other.
So again, what is more durable here?

And now mortars are shooting at both.
Which one is more durable now?


See, that is the context I meant.

Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2019, 08:18 AMHighfiveeeee

Still each mainline inf has AT nades behind a requirement.

Sovs pay fuel and manpower without getting a reward besides the nades
Ostheer pays fuel and manpower and gets T2 (but pays more than UKF for T2)
OKW needs a Truck
USF needs Vet 1

I don't see the point why Sappers are not suitable for the AT nades. UKF is usually the first army to tech to T2 (mostly on par with Ost skipping T1) and at this time, there is no need for AT nades. The only German vehicle at that moment of time is a Kübelwagen that can be taken out by small arms fire.