I don't know if these additions is possible, but I think it would be cool to:
1. Be able to see the date a player last played a match. This way you can get an idea how active players are.
2. Get a diagram of the activity of a player, like hours played / day
3. maybe change the W/L-percantage to 88.5% instead of .885% (because that is ratio, not percentage)
4. position of most played games
5. It should be able to enable search player on their in-game name at least in the top 200
6. Sort the ladder on wins/losses/%/total/streak/drops/disputes
That's what I can think of now
Suggestions on Ladders
26 Sep 2013, 12:29 PM
#1
Posts: 35
30 Sep 2013, 05:13 AM
#2
Posts: 35
No comments or thoughts on this at all?
30 Sep 2013, 08:43 AM
#3
5
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Fine ideas, and they would be very nice to have. At the moment we are showing you everything that we get from Relic. To show more we would have to archive our database frequently, and tbh the coding effort required to do that is too much for us right now. We have requested other sorts like "top streaks" and "most total games," and hope to provide those in the future.
30 Sep 2013, 08:44 AM
#4
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
I like the sound of those suggestions, I'm hoping that when the in game leaderboards come there will be a lot more options.
I would also like to see match history and some sort of deterioration on non active players.
I would also like to see match history and some sort of deterioration on non active players.
30 Sep 2013, 09:18 AM
#5
Posts: 217
What about Steam ladders, any news?
30 Sep 2013, 11:21 AM
#6
Posts: 829
I don't know if these additions is possible, but I think it would be cool to:
1. Be able to see the date a player last played a match. This way you can get an idea how active players are.
2. Get a diagram of the activity of a player, like hours played / day
3. maybe change the W/L-percantage to 88.5% instead of .885% (because that is ratio, not percentage)
4. position of most played games
5. It should be able to enable search player on their in-game name at least in the top 200
6. Sort the ladder on wins/losses/%/total/streak/drops/disputes
That's what I can think of now
Are you normal? One day you gonna find girlfriend and you will hate people who tag you on facebook. Last thing I want to have, is for my girlfriend to sit down to order pizza and see how much time I spent playing COH2 (Yes, I lie)
Other than that I think its good idea
30 Sep 2013, 11:31 AM
#7
Posts: 336
Are you normal? One day you gonna find girlfriend and you will hate people who tag you on facebook. Last thing I want to have, is for my girlfriend to sit down to order pizza and see how much time I spent playing COH2 (Yes, I lie)
Other than that I think its good idea
Then dont forget to turn your steam profile on private .
30 Sep 2013, 20:14 PM
#8
Posts: 35
I guess the top 200 is in a table, so to be able to sort after wins/losses/whatever should be quite easy to implement. Not that I'm a coder or anything
And if it is in a table you should be able to search for the ingame name aswell i guess
And if it is in a table you should be able to search for the ingame name aswell i guess
30 Sep 2013, 21:48 PM
#9
5
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
I guess the top 200 is in a table, so to be able to sort after wins/losses/whatever should be quite easy to implement. Not that I'm a coder or anything
I don't really see the point of sorting only the top 200 (which is what we get from Relic) for "top streaks" when the person with the highest streak may not be in the top 200. This other sort order, or "hook" as it were, would need to be pulled from the entire player database and thus provided to us by Relic.
1 Oct 2013, 07:37 AM
#10
Posts: 35
My point is that it is better than nothing
I mean the top 200 is the 200 best ppl out there. How many matches have they played? how many matches have they lost on the way to the top 200? I mean, maybe all data might not be that interesting, but if you implement sort on one of the columns, why not all.
And when you get all data from relic later (or maybe this solution is temporary?) it's already implemented
I mean the top 200 is the 200 best ppl out there. How many matches have they played? how many matches have they lost on the way to the top 200? I mean, maybe all data might not be that interesting, but if you implement sort on one of the columns, why not all.
And when you get all data from relic later (or maybe this solution is temporary?) it's already implemented
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
25 | |||||
14 | |||||
8 | |||||
139 | |||||
16 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
805 users are online:
1 member and 804 guests
aerafield
aerafield
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM