More 4v4 vetoes! Dumb relic!
Posts: 503
Permanently BannedIf i choose play only redball or port hamburg (the good maps) and wait 30 minutes is my problem...
But relic choose to dont able players play on preference maps, they wanna that i make early quit or fock the friend base for fun, because i dont wanna play more crap maps like essen, vielsalm, la gleize, lorch, steppes, etc.
Motherfocker dumb relic put more vetoes stupids!
Posts: 503
Permanently BannedGet all the time in game: lorch, essen, steppes...
Veto lorch, essen, steppes... Get all the time crap snow maps...
$hit relic! Devilish a hell !!!!
And you will be a god if you dont get this crap maps all day in consecutive games!!!!
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Moderators should lock, if calm does not enter this thread
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Did you played this game already for 1-2 years?
More shit maps in pool, mud and deep snow, big unbalanced maps from side.
Posts: 3260
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 2145 | Subs: 2
Veto lamzerath, vielsalm and la gleize (all snow crap maps)...
You no like snow maps? Why not?
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Why force players play crap maps that we wont wanna and are boring???
If i choose play only redball or port hamburg (the good maps) and wait 30 minutes is my problem...
But relic choose to dont able players play on preference maps, they wanna that i make early quit or fock the friend base for fun, because i dont wanna play more crap maps like essen, vielsalm, la gleize, lorch, steppes, etc.
Motherfocker dumb relic put more vetoes stupids!
====================
- Why? Because you chose automatch.
- If you want to play exclusively on Redball or Port Hamburg,
there is custom for that.
- I think we ought to be allowed to vetoe every single map every created.
And then go into automatch, and come back from vacation 3 months later knowing
we're still in queue
They should make a small map that's blank and white except no flags
with a huge impassable wall in the middle, US trump style.
This map would become the default for people who used up too many vetoes
Accept variety, or play custom
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
Sometimes i am wondering me a lot.
Did you played this game already for 1-2 years?
More shit maps in pool, mud and deep snow, big unbalanced maps from side.
Not sure if you paid attention to Bravus before but basically this guy's whole agenda over the past years was to do nothing but BabyRage about coh2, even if it didnt make sense.
It was funny enough tho that Essen steelworks or Steppes were listed as unbalanced 4v4 maps by him above, whereas HAMBURG as a good/balanced one
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 102
Id sooner see some of the maps that were removed from 4v4 be reintroduced, which i then believe would add a extra veto.
I would love to see City 17, Across the Rhine and Angermunde back in 4v4. I thought these were all really fun maps to play.
Maps removed seems to just be personal preference from 1 or 2 people rather than what the community actually wanted.
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
You no like snow maps? Why not?
Viesalm is a god awful map, the others are fine but sometimes the snow maps cause FPS drops.
I'm just kinda curious what is so bad about Steppes? I find it one of the best 3v3/4v4 maps in the pool. Almost mirror, how I like it, and the only real issue IMO is elevation at some areas. But certainly more enjoyable than La Gleize for example.
Steppes is an interesting map for sure, if the teams are evenly matched then the fighting flows along the entire map very well and can lead to some awesome matches. The issue is incompetent players are even more noticeable on this map cuz every player must pull their weight considering how large the map is.
La Gleize North still has that horrendous cutoff on their fuel that is almost always contested. I feel like I never lose La Gleize if I play south. Also the snow + buildings is fps hell.
The current map pool is better than it use to be. I remember the glory days of Sittard Summer, City 17 and Rostov Winter or whatever it was called. Which was an automatic no fun match no matter what.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2145 | Subs: 2
Whats the problem about snow maps? At this point it´s just a cosmetic thing.
There are some special effects markers that float large fog/cloud textures close to the camera. These textures bog down the GPU very badly.
There are also additional things like drawing the snow in the air, snow on the ground, foot steps, vehicle tracks which all add to the drop in FPS.
Most of the 3v3 and 4v4 snow maps were reworked to improve FPS (except LaGleize). It will be interesting to see if snow maps become more popular after the rework.
A good spot to test on LaGleize is just left of the center VP by the munition. That is where the fog textures are pretty heavy.
But I am always going to ask people about snow maps to verify what exactly bogs them down for all sorts of PCs and hardware.
Posts: 712
Posts: 493
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
I have the same feeling with map vetoes, why force people to play maps that they dont like. Its like torture. Should be like counter strike, you chose the maps you want to play, even if its only one map.
Hopefully CoH3 will have a much better veto system and/or much better map selection from the beginning. Playing on the less than ideal maps can be such an annoyance.
Livestreams
21 | |||||
14 | |||||
188 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1122623.643+3
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger