Feedback for Commander Revamppatch

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 07:52 AMullumulu

Yeah. Pls hummel and wespe for axis ...to avoid instant kill from german arti after this first barrage. And ...faust on pgrens and stpios pls. To get the same impact like the sappers from brits.

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 07:58 AMIncendiaryRounds

Ostruppen should get a grenade after vet 2. It's quite lacklustre after cons got a consistency buff. And the lmg upgrade comes way too late and yet it doesn't even perform as well as the gren lmg when it takes at least 20 min to tech t4

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 08:06 AMLemonJuice

if its taking you 20 minutes to get to battle phase 4 youve already lost. you dont even need to make the tier structure you just need to tech bp4.

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 08:45 AMIncendiaryRounds

In 1v1 it's reasonable to research t4 at 20 it takes 15min to get p4 on average. U don't play 1v1 according to your playercard

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 07:59 AMKatitof

Ok.

Now grens and volks do not have fausts, it have been moved to PGs and spios to mirror availability of the ability on sappers.

Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2018, 21:54 PMAndy_RE

We're reading all your feedback guys! Lot's of well-made points. Keep it coming.

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 09:28 AMKirrik

Neither Osttruppen nor JLI should get anything at all, they are already superior to their Allied counterparts
Fusiliers for Overwatch is not reasonable either, as long as that doc has howitzer

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 10:45 AMIncendiaryRounds

What is ostruppen superior to? You can theoretically beat cons and rifles at absolute max range, but riflemen can easily afford to close the gap. Cons can successfully close the gap half the time. If the ostruppen are anything other than max range, they won't have an advantage. The initial 40-80mp advantage is the biggest reason why people get ostruppen. Ostruppen doc is a bit like airborne for the fact that it allows flexible teching decisions. Expect railway arty is straight up a piece of trash and ostruppen is lacklustre. On the other hand, paras are great regardless of upgrade choice, p47 loves to chase armor across the whole map though it's techincally supposed to stay within the circle, and pathfinders are extremely useful.

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 10:08 AMnigo

Remove Shock trops from Urban commander. We dont need another commander with that unit.

Be creative pls.

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 10:52 AMKirrik

Stop acting like Vipper and avoid subject

Osttruppen have better scaling into late game than Cons as of now, they dont need anything else, especially HE nades for a defensive unit

Pathfinders are already inferior to JLI yet you claim JLI needs buffs... on account of what? Just because they are on Axis side? Paratroopers and P47 is pure offtopic from you.



They are there as an excuse for a rework. Anything outside of designated doctrines is no-go for some weird reason. Thats why KV-8 was shoehorned into NKVD

Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2018, 10:58 AMOrangePest

Shocks don't fit thematically tbf, personally i'd give them partisans (AI) and replace the kv8 with something that's somewhat useful, and since urban defenses promotes a more infantry heavy style it might as well be the kv1, which might as well be an infantry support unit.

• KV-8 Doctrines (5)
  
  • Anti-Infantry Tactics
  • NKVD Rifle Disruption Tactics
  • Shock Rifle Frontline Tactics
  • Soviet Industry Tactics
  • Terror Tactics

• KV-1 Doctrines (3)
  
  • Counterattack Tactics
  • Conscript Support Tactics
  • Guards Rifle Combined Arms Tactics

• T-34/85 Doctrines (3)
  
  • Advanced Warfare Tactics
  • Guard Motor Coordination Tactics
  • Armored Assault Tactics

• M4C Sherman Doctrines (1)
  
  • Lend Lease Tactics