backing my KT up against a house and still losing it to 4 M10 callins frontally
You say that like there's something wrong with that....
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
backing my KT up against a house and still losing it to 4 M10 callins frontally
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
You say that like there's something wrong with that....
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Probably because certain units have no buisness penetrating other certain units frontally. A t70 can pen a KT frontally with enough luck. Nothing wrong there though right?
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Since penetration chance is a mathematical equation and not IRL simulated value, then no, nothing wrong with it.
222 can pen IS-2 frontally as well.
Its arcade RTS game.
Not WW2 simulation.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
That is a very limited mindset. Because something is RNG doesn't make it balanced.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
That is LITERALLY A GAME MECHANIC!
Do you often lose KT to T-70 or IS-2 to 222?
If yes, then balance isn't a problem here as that RNG is balanced.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
That is LITERALLY A GAME MECHANIC!
Do you often lose KT to T-70 or IS-2 to 222?
If yes, then balance isn't a problem here as that RNG is balanced.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So what is your point? People should be able to win games with enough luck?
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
That is how this whole series is balanced since forever.
That means weaker unit may get lucky and win against stronger unit.
Glad you finally noticed.
But again, if you're losing significantly stronger units to units that are non factors for them, that is not balance fault, that is you being bad beyond the human comprehension.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So when something is in place "since forever" even though it could be a bad mechanic, don't change it. Got it. You'd do pretty well at relic, you could probably come up with some more abandon/maingun crit mechanics that add so much fun and complexity to their games.
Buzz off.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
So what do you want?
Ultimate RNG like in Men of War?
Or re-textured Red Alert?
Buzz off.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
You missed this part
Posts: 54
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
katitof, you post everywhere, but 99/100 you are angry ^^ all your 10.000 posts are angry? maybe narzismn? i just ask, its feels like.
Posts: 609
Yeah, I know most people prefer the fast-paced game, being older and slower, I preferred the old game
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
So what is your point? People should be able to win games with enough luck?
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
4 M10s winning vs 1 KT doesn't sound like luck. It sounds like 360 fuel worth of TDs doing it's job.
And by your logic, because you backed up your KT into a building, it should be invincible to anything short of a heavy TD? That sounds like a fun game to play
Posts: 3053
Posts: 609
Posts: 1484
6 | |||||
159 | |||||
12 | |||||
5 |