data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d839/7d83905a61e28aa70d75eabed9e8dd48996b6300" alt=":snfPeter: :snfPeter:"
If so how would you change it and why?
Posts: 1276
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 609
Posts: 69
Posts: 2742
Posts: 728
Posts: 728
Make them an all tech army IE you must tech both lieut and capt before t4. Lieut and capt dont come for free but can still be built from said building. Move at gun to lieut and aa HT to captain. Adjust cost and timing (reg sherman should arrive faster that p4 esp okw p4 if no fuel was spent on light vehicles only bars/zook upgrade because every know that is a MUST upgrade.
This would allow for USF to get out .50cal and at gun faster, as well as save you some mp to be able to afford .cal at guns pathfinders aibrone ranger etc by not have the captain or lieut take up an ifantry spot IF you dont want them to.
Edit: of course this would take adjustments on tech cost and unit cost with testing
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 728
If you make USF tech more linear and friendly, they'd have to either nerf the power of the 50cal and m1, or buff the OKW counterparts.I have thought about that and I agree, IDk that the m1 would really be a big deal mostly the .50cal would prolly have to be nerfed a bit
Posts: 728
If you make USF tech more linear and friendly, they'd have to either nerf the power of the 50cal and m1, or buff the OKW counterparts.I wouldnt care if they buffed the mg34 dmg a bit, i think the rakt is fine tho i know its not a regular at gun but its spammable t0 camo can retreat its simply not a bad unit in consideration of it being used against allies its really pretty effective.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
- Remove free LT, Cpt and Mjr
- Move HMG and M1 in T0 with tier 1 or 2 unlock
- Lt, Cpt are now purchasable as they are when killed (manpower price)
- Reduce T3 price by half: unlock Scott and Major
- Mjr cost the other half of T3 price, when purchased: sherman and Jackson are unlocked
There is also a need to redesign Airborn with that.
Posts: 2742
Yes, if this was a possibility 2 years ago. At most i could see some units been swapped.
Posts: 138
If you make USF tech more linear and friendly, they'd have to either nerf the power of the 50cal and m1, or buff the OKW counterparts.
Posts: 495 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
factions should not be balanced around OKW
Rak is fine and balanced thanks to stealth/retreat, MG34 could use gaining vet a bit faster but stick on AP rounds and it goes to town.
Posts: 138
They should be balanced around each other. I.e. if both factions have support teams in t0 they should be equal. Instead of 50 cal > MG34 and M1 > rak
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Personally I feel USF are in a good place, but m20 and zooks need a bit of love. Maybe a small AT buff on the stuart too. Quite happy with tech and officers, if they were not free people would ignore them and spam paras/rangers.
But not all factions do, are you forgetting soviets and maxim t2? It's a bit silly to change USF scope in regards to OKW balance when other factions still lack certain elements.
if OKW tools are that bad then buff them (really can't see what they are lacking bar the slightly UP MG34), but nerfing allies even more to screw up Ost balance is not the way to go. 50.cals already get nuked by rifle nades.
This sounds like a good idea, but you'd have ostheer and soviets with non T0 support teams. They'd either get dumpstered for 6 months cause thats how long you wait for patches, or this would probably be a no go.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
119 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
46 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
28 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
24 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
18 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8 |