The real question is why a 2500 rank player feels the need of spreading misinformation based on wrong stats and make pretentious and laughable claims.
The irony...
i can't stop laughing xD
Posts: 221
The irony...
Posts: 221
Except that is only you saying that...any other user here knows how trashy raketenwerfer is.
No atg miss units like that...not even close.
With extreme low target size..misses may occurr rarely on tergets at the bottom of the atg arc.
The most ridicolous parts is that there isn't such thing as "moving target" at all, accuracy is affected only by the mivement if the unit that is firing...but i DO LOVE how you try so hard (failing) to make it look like you actually have a grasp of basic vehicle/at mechanics of this game.
Putting raketen in building deny cloak and the atg fires on infantry wasting shots, same for sturm shreck...300 mp for something as pathetic as a single shreck squad is ridicolous...
the claim that tools as snares and mines that other factions don't lack should fill the gap (which has no reason to exist to begin with), that sturmshreck is of any use, that raketen garrison is underappreciated (lol), that vehicles are somewhat harder to hit when moving...are ridicolous and only show how short sighted you are with your 2500 4vs4 rank with just 18 matches in.
The real question is why a 2500 rank player feels the need of spreading misinformation based on wrong stats and make pretentious and laughable claims.
Posts: 2145 | Subs: 2
and if the raketenwerfer was so bad, then why do you guys only come up with that now? it has been like that for a long time. if this is what makes okw so bad, then you are the guy that makes the laughable claims.
Posts: 221
Tell that to the DSHK. It was never changed. Then Maxim gets nerfed. Then all you heard was DSHK is OP
When OKW didnt feel so weak you didnt have to rely on the Rak. Now you do. And it feels useless.
Posts: 309 | Subs: 1
I don't know who came up with those genius change. But OKW right now has the worst basic infantry, the most expensive tech, lowest Price/performance ratio tanks, and the most terrible artillery (ISG is pretty much a stone catapult, and it still got nerfed wtf!!). On the other hand, infantry section, guards and conscript are buffed, how is okw player supposes to win a infantry engagement while volks are significantly overpowered by rifleman and infantry sections. These infantry changes require OKW players to rely more on their light armors, and guess what, Panzer 2 and Stuka also got nerfed. Whoever made this balance pack may just as well add a "free win" bottom to Allied players screen whenever they meet a OKW
Posts: 3053
Posts: 7
Aww did your volks lose a couple models to a rifleman squad or something? This is definitely a rage thread lol.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 1954
Posts: 1660
Posts: 39
Posts: 39
Aww did your volks lose a couple models to a rifleman squad or something? This is definitely a rage thread lol.
Don't forget that tommies also got nerfed this patch, and riflemen last patch, and volks were overperforming hard in the lategame. Their first 5 minute performance isn't even really changed, its just their later vet bonuses that got toned down so they don't steamroll more expensive squads with 2x the muni investment with minimal effort anymore.
Posts: 246
OKW should be mechanized Company but u need the most fuel of all factions.
Posts: 2145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 246
Posts: 7
3 | |||||
42 | |||||
9 |