Login

russian armor

[DBP] Mechanized Doctrine feedback thread

15 Dec 2017, 14:55 PM
#61
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not questioning balance here. I'm under no delusions that I somehow know better than a team of experienced modders with access to the numbers and a wealth of playtesting data. I'm not sure I could make any meaningful contribution to a balance discussion.

What I'm talking about here is design. Again, I'm confident you know better than me here (and imo better than Relic on the Stuart/AAHT swap). I ask questions because I want to understand.

Back to Assault Engineers:

If the problem is "how do we bundle a halftrack and Assault Engineers together in a call-in without making it prohibitively expensive" the current solution is excellent.

Nevertheless it feels a little awkward: you've got to faff around rearranging vehicle crews to get the Assault Engineers out. I don't think it's a matter of dispute that having a normal vehicle crew in the halftrack is more straightforward.

Mechanized has a lot of doctrinal abilities in it: the new WC51 and Sherman Modifications alone have enough abilities to make a commander (old WC51, Mark Target, 75mm Sherman Bulldozer, 155mm Artillery, M4C 76mm Sherman). Unless having the Assault Engineers is important might it not be a net benefit not to have them? You cut down on the amount of doctrinal stuff in a commander that presently has a fair bit more than its counterparts and you make a small QoL improvement to the M3 Halftrack.


15 Dec 2017, 15:06 PM
#62
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Dec 2017, 14:55 PMLago
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not questioning balance here. I'm under no delusions that I somehow know better than a team of experienced modders with access to the numbers and a wealth of playtesting data. I'm not sure I could make any meaningful contribution to a balance discussion.

What I'm talking about here is design. Again, I'm confident you know better than me here (and imo better than Relic on the Stuart/AAHT swap). I ask questions because I want to understand.

Back to Assault Engineers:

If the problem is "how do we bundle a halftrack and Assault Engineers together in a call-in without making it prohibitively expensive" the current solution is excellent.

Nevertheless it feels a little awkward: you've got to faff around rearranging vehicle crews to get the Assault Engineers out. I don't think it's a matter of dispute that having a normal vehicle crew in the halftrack is more straightforward.

Mechanized has a lot of doctrinal abilities in it: the new WC51 and Sherman Modifications alone have enough abilities to make a commander (old WC51, Mark Target, 75mm Sherman Bulldozer, 155mm Artillery, M4C 76mm Sherman). Unless having the Assault Engineers is important might it not be a net benefit not to have them? You cut down on the amount of doctrinal stuff in a commander that presently has a fair bit more than its counterparts and you make a small QoL improvement to the M3 Halftrack.


Given that Rear Echelons get mines and that Demo charges are no longer stupidly OP, Assault Engineer utility feels significantly diminished. However, given that the bundle solution seems to work, it seems like an OK workaround to maintain the original flavour of the ability, without introducing something stupidly OP (e.g., yet another unique doctrinal USF infantry squad).

Keeping Assault Engineers in the call-in is also a nice excuse to fix that waste of a unit for other doctrines too.

Do note, however, that the commander has lost access to easy-to-use off-maps. WC-51 dodge requires a dive to call in the artillery at the desired location.
15 Dec 2017, 15:24 PM
#63
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742


Keeping Assault Engineers in the call-in is also a nice excuse to fix that waste of a unit for other doctrines too.


Geez, you have got such a vendetta against assault engineers... they're excellent units whose biggest fault is being doctrinal and not replacing REs.

They can be timed so that an assault engineer and riflemen are hitting the front by the time sturm pios and a kubel are on the front.

Since the theme of all this is teamgames, assault engies routinely give me, to speak for myself, the edge on maps where you have to rush key garrisons. Which is, like, every teamgame map that isn't steppes.

I don't feel like you've properly defined why you feel so strongly that they're such a waste of a unit.

They do have less use with nerfed demos and RE mines, but still. Flame. Throwers.
15 Dec 2017, 15:28 PM
#64
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Given that Rear Echelons get mines and that Demo charges are no longer stupidly OP, Assault Engineer utility feels significantly diminished.

Was making them a competent short range combat squad like Sturmpioneers ever considered?

Keeping Assault Engineers in the call-in is also a nice excuse to fix that waste of a unit for other doctrines too.

Were you to remove them now would Relic make you roll back the Assault Engineer changes for Armor Company?

Do note, however, that the commander has lost access to easy-to-use off-maps. WC-51 dodge requires a dive to call in the artillery at the desired location.

Fair point.
18 Dec 2017, 09:49 AM
#65
avatar of Rocket

Posts: 728

Upon further thought i think they should get rid of the m3 altogether and have cavalry rifles instead with a possible thompson non op version upgrade. Heres why too much of the doct cost fuel, you really cant make the dodge mortar ht and the m3 or your mostly going to be screwed by medium rushes or any tanky vehicles like luchs or puma. Its a lot of fuel for zero at and set you too far behind for the shiny things sherman with upgrade and 76 sherman imo. Idk i think the mp only cavalry rifle call ins just makes sense and flows well with the doct. And like others said id just rather hve an ambulance usf have no other way to heal if your relying on m3 ht instead, it dosent heal right? Now that i think about it im not sure if i looked at it that closely when i was playing around with it either way still think too much fuel cost items and dosent conjunction well
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 AM
#66
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Dec 2017, 09:49 AMRocket
And like others said id just rather hve an ambulance usf have no other way to heal if your relying on m3 ht instead, it dosent heal right?


Yes it does.

It's 30MU for a triple-medpak drop (like the Sturmpioneer version). Medpaks heal your units much faster than ambulances do (2.5 times faster iirc?), and you don't have to be hugging your M3 the whole time either. Just get your squad up to full, grab a medkit and get out of there.
18 Dec 2017, 14:10 PM
#67
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260



Yes it does.

It's 30MU for a triple-medpak drop (like the Sturmpioneer version). Medpaks heal your units much faster than ambulances do (2.5 times faster iirc?), and you don't have to be hugging your M3 the whole time either. Just get your squad up to full, grab a medkit and get out of there.


How durable is it compared to the other faction halftracks? The first post of this thread says high durability - is that compared to the Ambulance or compared to the other halftracks?
18 Dec 2017, 16:20 PM
#68
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Dec 2017, 14:10 PMLago


How durable is it compared to the other faction halftracks? The first post of this thread says high durability - is that compared to the Ambulance or compared to the other halftracks?


It's comparable to Soviet M5. IIRC correctly that one of the beefiest halftracks in the game. The M3 now also has a kickass MG which it can now use while reinforcing your troops.
18 Dec 2017, 16:37 PM
#69
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

It's comparable to Soviet M5. IIRC correctly that one of the beefiest halftracks in the game. The M3 now also has a kickass MG which it can now use while reinforcing your troops.


How does that MG compare to the MGs mounted on other USF vehicles?
18 Dec 2017, 16:40 PM
#70
avatar of Ulaire Minya

Posts: 372

It's the Sherman's pintle. 50, arguably the strongest vehicle mg in the game.
18 Dec 2017, 16:55 PM
#71
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Do the mounted 50.cals have the same stats wherever they're mounted then? I thought they varied in stats from unit to unit despite being thematically the same weapon like slot weapons do.
18 Dec 2017, 18:23 PM
#72
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1


Do note, however, that the commander has lost access to easy-to-use off-maps. WC-51 dodge requires a dive to call in the artillery at the desired location.


jump backJump back to quoted post15 Dec 2017, 15:28 PMLago

Fair point.


Do note that you can now use it before CP8 which is a fair compensation for it. I don't think Mr.Smith thought who OP it could be on 4vs4 with so much resources for an USF player to spam it so early in the game. Assuming the player doesn't upgrade BARs...
18 Dec 2017, 22:59 PM
#73
avatar of Svanh

Posts: 181

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Dec 2017, 16:55 PMLago
Do the mounted 50.cals have the same stats wherever they're mounted then? I thought they varied in stats from unit to unit despite being thematically the same weapon like slot weapons do.

They do vary from unit to unit but presumably the variant on the M3 has the same stats as the Sherman pintle MG.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 2
unknown 2
Canada 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

828 users are online: 2 members and 826 guests
praptitourism, СВО online
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49400
Welcome our newest member, praptitourism
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM