Here is for all of you who might have questions how and with what to run coh2 at full or maxed out.
http://www.techspot.com/review/689-company-of-heroes-2-performance/page3.html
As you can see this game HORRIBLY bad of being optimized..... as you can see a GTX TITAN (1000 Euro card) ONLY gets 45 FPS!!! WTF!
*edit* AND that was on 1680 x 1050............ and at 1920 x1200 a TITAN only gets 39 FPS........
Who made this game?
Coh2 Benchmarked..... Horrible....
6 Aug 2013, 17:15 PM
#1
Posts: 154
6 Aug 2013, 17:19 PM
#2
Posts: 97
im satysfied with my gts250 performance on all low i get around 30 fps - game runs smooth
to troll you a lil bit that game was optimised around low end cards buahahahaha
to troll you a lil bit that game was optimised around low end cards buahahahaha
6 Aug 2013, 20:27 PM
#3
Posts: 627
The optimization in this game is appalling, to say the least. I have a 4x3.2 GHz i7, a GT 630M(Which is mid-high end, hardly great but still good), 8 gigs of RAM and I'm less than 40 frames on a 1366x768 resolution, on ABSOLUTE MINIMUM. The only thing I don't have on minimum is game resolution which is on 66% instead of the lowest option.
I find that absolutely ridiculous. It's not a top end rig by any means, due to the GPU, but I manage to run extremely demanding games on higher frames. It's not like CoH2 has taken leaps and bounds in graphics improvements since CoH1 or DoW2.
I find that absolutely ridiculous. It's not a top end rig by any means, due to the GPU, but I manage to run extremely demanding games on higher frames. It's not like CoH2 has taken leaps and bounds in graphics improvements since CoH1 or DoW2.
6 Aug 2013, 21:06 PM
#4
Posts: 154
This games graphics is not mind blowing like crysis 2/3, hell - are they saying that coh2 is more demanding grapicaly than Metro 2033??
Metro 2033 + GTX Titan x 1920 x 1200 = 45.2 FPS
Coh2 + GTX Titan x 1920 x 1200 = 39 FPS!!!
Metro 2033 + GTX Titan x 1920 x 1200 = 45.2 FPS
Coh2 + GTX Titan x 1920 x 1200 = 39 FPS!!!
6 Aug 2013, 21:23 PM
#5
Posts: 252
umm im pretty sure every strategy game is more demanding than any other game...and the thing with metro is , its great (big fan, books and games) but its not as demanding as coh2 cuz its mostly going on in dark tunnels and in dimmed lighting which and it doesnt requre much frames there
btw im running not very good rig
e5400 2.6g , 3gb ram and Ati HD5670 with 30-25 frames on high (AA low) and is nicely playable
+30 frames is very fluid, damn it consoles run everything on 30frames and no1 complans after they get used to it
btw im running not very good rig
e5400 2.6g , 3gb ram and Ati HD5670 with 30-25 frames on high (AA low) and is nicely playable
+30 frames is very fluid, damn it consoles run everything on 30frames and no1 complans after they get used to it
Alehandro, Ale Ale-handro
6 Aug 2013, 21:48 PM
#6
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
Strange, I can run the game maxed at 60 FPS.
However, I normally turn AA down to low as I don't think you need it any higher.
However, I normally turn AA down to low as I don't think you need it any higher.
6 Aug 2013, 21:50 PM
#7
Posts: 154
I am saying that coh2 is SO FAR one of the MOST demanding games out there - or more than likely - its SHIT optimized.
If even the most powerfull single GPU card cant get more than 45.2 FPS maxing the game out... then that is sad.
And if we go as far as they guys having a 2560 x 1600 monitor then they have 25 FPS...
Are you saying that coh 2 is SO spectacular to justify these CRAP scores?
If even the most powerfull single GPU card cant get more than 45.2 FPS maxing the game out... then that is sad.
And if we go as far as they guys having a 2560 x 1600 monitor then they have 25 FPS...
Are you saying that coh 2 is SO spectacular to justify these CRAP scores?
6 Aug 2013, 21:54 PM
#8
Posts: 252
no but considering my crap gig its not that bad, its not bad at all. paper and practice dont always match ya know
Alehandro, Ale Ale-handro
6 Aug 2013, 22:00 PM
#9
Posts: 154
I am talking about maxing out the game as much as possible - just not optimized well enough.
6 Aug 2013, 22:02 PM
#10
Posts: 2
Yes horribel optimization. There's so many things that makes the final game feel like an Alpha. Game balance, optimization, the graphix in the meny...
Anyway Im supprized and utterly glad that i can run 30 fps at my core2duo in 3ghz, GTX285 and 4 GB of DDR2 ram. With settigs at high detail/texture medium else in 1920x1200.
Anyway Im supprized and utterly glad that i can run 30 fps at my core2duo in 3ghz, GTX285 and 4 GB of DDR2 ram. With settigs at high detail/texture medium else in 1920x1200.
6 Aug 2013, 22:04 PM
#11
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
I wouldn't compare RTS games to FPS games, they have different techniques when it comes to optimization.
I do feel like something is wrong tho, looking at the logs it seems like the game cannot detect total video ram.
23:44:22.77 SPDx11 -- 3072MB dedicated video memory, I have 6k.
I do feel like something is wrong tho, looking at the logs it seems like the game cannot detect total video ram.
23:44:22.77 SPDx11 -- 3072MB dedicated video memory, I have 6k.
7 Aug 2013, 04:39 AM
#12
Posts: 1560 | Subs: 1
The game is probably capped at 3072MB vid memory. This whole benchmarking thing is just nonsense. I run the game with the highest settings @1080p and my FPS never goes below 40 (And that is only in the lategame wih endless explosions and blizzards).
7 Aug 2013, 12:50 PM
#13
Posts: 2779
This games graphics is not mind blowing like crysis 2/3, hell - are they saying that coh2 is more demanding grapicaly than Metro 2033??
Metro 2033 + GTX Titan x 1920 x 1200 = 45.2 FPS
Coh2 + GTX Titan x 1920 x 1200 = 39 FPS!!!
Impossible, my i5 4670K + GTX670 rig can run at 50 FPS with slight OC
without OC 45 FPS
7 Aug 2013, 19:54 PM
#14
Posts: 154
Well - do you have ALL maxed out? with AA etc etc? just check out the benchmark link and see for yourself.
8 Aug 2013, 02:42 AM
#15
Posts: 331
It is well known that coh2 is 1. Horribly optimized and 2. runs completely different on different machines for no apparent reason.
Also, these benchmarks aren't new or anything, I remember when they first came out.
Also, these benchmarks aren't new or anything, I remember when they first came out.
21 Aug 2013, 13:32 PM
#16
Posts: 4
I am stuck at 20+-5 fps regardless if I use low AA or High AA. So I use high of course
. Everything else is maxed.
edit: I followed a link in the comments to the attached article and found a tip. By turning of the "replay" recordning during a game I am now running at 35-40 fps (AA low)
check it out if you're interested http://www.kotaku.com.au/2013/07/company-of-heroes-2-running-like-garbage-this-tweak-might-help/
. Everything else is maxed.edit: I followed a link in the comments to the attached article and found a tip. By turning of the "replay" recordning during a game I am now running at 35-40 fps (AA low)
check it out if you're interested http://www.kotaku.com.au/2013/07/company-of-heroes-2-running-like-garbage-this-tweak-might-help/
25 Aug 2013, 12:24 PM
#17
Posts: 44
Yeah, not sure what happened to CoH2 but the performance is definitely worse than it should be. Probably has to do with it being rushed at THQ. Not sure why this is controversial to some here, the game doesn't even have SLI support which is a telltale sign that they didn't have enough time to work on the backend.
Hopefully Relic can better optimize their next game.
Hopefully Relic can better optimize their next game.
28 Aug 2013, 21:05 PM
#18
Posts: 154
its too rushed.... and not even suporting SLi...??
28 Aug 2013, 21:56 PM
#19
15 
Posts: 786
7970ghz and 3570k, runs flawlessly on high settings at 1920x1200
29 Aug 2013, 05:59 AM
#20
Posts: 154
7970ghz and 3570k, runs flawlessly on high settings at 1920x1200
how many fps?? maybe 15 fps is flawless for you?? If the titan runs at max settings and only scores 40+ fps.... then I doubt that you can this game on MAX settings and achieve better than that.
A RTS like this should be at LEAST 60 fps with a 1000 euros card. AS I have said before - or does coh2 justify the fps that you can get?? Is it THAT good and THAT stunning that what you get is what you get as the game is so AWSOME?
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
65 | ||
 |
|
|
42 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
168 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
448 users are online:
448 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM