Login

russian armor

Factional Showdown E2: USF vs. OKW - sign ups!

24 Aug 2017, 07:42 AM
#21
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 06:27 AMA_E
UPDATE: so obviously with FBP on hold there's no point in us testing it anymore, so this event is now on the live patch.

(However in future we may look at the revamp mod depending on the situation at the time).

I gotta object against this, fbp is thousand times better then live game man....
A_E
24 Aug 2017, 10:29 AM
#22
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6


I gotta object against this, fbp is thousand times better then live game man....


Then test your logic why use a half-baked test build for a dead patch. Something the players aren't used to and isn't getting released?
24 Aug 2017, 11:17 AM
#23
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

Would a better compromise be doing the factional showdown on live-patch and requiring participants not to use call-ins until they've teched major/T4?

Otherwise, live-version USF vs OKW is a bit of a borefest :(
24 Aug 2017, 11:17 AM
#24
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 10:29 AMA_E


Then test your logic why use a half-baked test build for a dead patch. Something the players aren't used to and isn't getting released?

My logic: FBP is 10 times better then live game.
It is already released its not implemented in the actual game. Something which players arent used doesnt necesarilly mean we shouldnt use it imo :)
A_E
24 Aug 2017, 12:47 PM
#25
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

Would a better compromise be doing the factional showdown on live-patch and requiring participants not to use call-ins until they've teched major/T4?

Otherwise, live-version USF vs OKW is a bit of a borefest :(


Until we have had time as a community to discuss exactly what we are going to do with regards to taking the competitive balance forward ourselves. I don't want a half baked solution and would prefer live.

A_E
24 Aug 2017, 12:49 PM
#26
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

We can not afford fractured approaches we will have one chance to create a scene around a mod and will need an organized and teamwork based response.
24 Aug 2017, 12:52 PM
#27
avatar of BartonPL

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

i'm 19th with OKW :snfBarton:
24 Aug 2017, 12:56 PM
#28
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 12:49 PMA_E
We can not afford fractured approaches we will have one chance to create a scene around a mod and will need an organized and teamwork based response.

I see your point. Be ready for Command Panthers though.
24 Aug 2017, 12:57 PM
#29
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

i'm 19th with OKW :snfBarton:

Sucks to be you :(
24 Aug 2017, 14:00 PM
#30
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

I wish all USA Player MUCH RNG and luck to play vs OKW in live Version!!!!!

A_E
24 Aug 2017, 14:14 PM
#31
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

I wish all USA Player MUCH RNG and luck to play vs OKW in live Version!!!!!



Armor company spam surely!?
24 Aug 2017, 14:23 PM
#32
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 14:14 PMA_E


Armor company spam surely!?


If they survive the kübel luchs rush, yeah. But that makes the game not better to Play/ watch xD

It's up to you, but

A) from Fairness between USA and OKW
B) from new gameplay
C) no call in spam
D) more Fun to watch(because not old meta)

--> I would like to see People playing 1vs1 on the FBP

But ofc it's your choice. You are the admin of this here!

I place my bet: OKW will win this Cup(Noggano) under live Version.

P.S yes i'm mad/ pissed about the "patch" Situation ...
24 Aug 2017, 15:44 PM
#33
avatar of BartonPL

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

with all respect, but one simple change to increase costing for call-ins without proper tech is already a good reason why this and future tourneys should be hosted with FBP
A_E
24 Aug 2017, 15:47 PM
#34
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

Gonna have a think about this tonight and a talk to people including Mr Smith
A_E
24 Aug 2017, 17:15 PM
#35
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

OK had a think come up with a new system that makes the best out of the live patch. (Definitely interested in mods in the future but only comprehensive approaches that the community is behind)


Commander Veto System

Every player selected must veto two commanders of the opposing faction that they do not wish to play against.

These commanders cannot be played against this player.

Note: if in a same-faction-wins-semis scenario, in the bo3 final the player vetoing cannot play as their vetoed commanders either.
24 Aug 2017, 17:19 PM
#36
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 17:15 PMA_E
OK had a think come up with a new system that makes the best out of the live patch. (Definitely interested in mods in the future but only comprehensive approaches that the community is behind)


Commander Veto System

Every player selected must veto three commanders of the opposing faction that they do not wish to play against.

These commanders cannot be played against this player.

Note: if in a same-faction-wins-semis scenario, in the bo3 final the player vetoing cannot play as their vetoed commanders either.

Seems cool, only one problem. Usf only has 3 good 1v1 commanders :oops:

Edit: Nvm, it's fine. Usf has more options.
A_E
24 Aug 2017, 17:20 PM
#37
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6


Seems cool, only one problem. Usf only has 3 good 1v1 commanders :oops:


OKW without command panther, panzer fusies, or Goliath (/s), same problems ;)
24 Aug 2017, 17:21 PM
#38
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 17:20 PMA_E


OKW without command panther, panzer fusies, or Goliath (/s), same problems ;)

I gues most people will veto command panther sturmtiger and panzer fusies. Which means you still have goliath and fortifications and luftwaffe, which are all decent-good commanders.
A_E
24 Aug 2017, 17:23 PM
#39
avatar of A_E
Lead Caster Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6


I gues most people will veto command panther sturmtiger and panzer fusies. Which means you still have goliath and fortifications and luftwaffe, which are all decent-good commanders.


Lowered it to two commander vetoes.
24 Aug 2017, 17:24 PM
#40
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Aug 2017, 17:23 PMA_E


Lowered it to two commander vetoes.

That seems fair.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

785 users are online: 785 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM