Ok then, what do you do as usf against kubelspam?
You get rekt.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Ok then, what do you do as usf against kubelspam?
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Curious. What is the objective of this thread? USF seems to be in a "balanced" position more or less. Rifles are more powerful than volks as they should be since they're more expensive, and through upgrades, overpower them later game when fully equipped. The stuart is stronger against armor than infantry, that's alright considering it is capable of engaging both with some effect. If you're expecting a primarily AT light tank to tear apart infantry like the old T70 did you're going to disappointed. If this thread is just about USF issues, yes they have them, like all factions. Try playing on a heavy garrison map as OKW, or playing UKF against luchs spam. All factions have design flaws and issues ingame.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 935
Posts: 1740
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
it is true early to midgame, USF doesn't outperform anymore OKW or Ostheer early game.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Just a question as I haven't played allies in 1v1 for a long time.
Kübelwagenspam is really a thing?!
i always overrun usf with my Terminator grens who will win at any Ranges except max range early game.
Dude what are you Smoking, rifles are still the most potent mainline infantry
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Try 2 or 3 kubel start vs a USF player on an open map and see what happens.
What 99% of what you say never make any sense. You're not even good at trolling.
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1
Against Wehr, once you meet better players sniper plays will be a lot more prominent and USF is helpless against well-microed sniper without diving with an M20. With UKF/Sov you can counter snipe reliably and the sniper is less effective against Sov's 6 man squads. Gooooooodd fucking luck flanking the sniper in time to kill it and if you fail you throw even more MP into the dustbin. Snipers will ravage you senseless all game.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Compared to the Soviets, the United States is so easy to play (I prefer combined-arms operations: Conscripts + Maxim + mortar in the further transition to the Shoock Troops). You have a powerful versatile Rifle squad and if you took the Heavy Cavalry Commander a wonderful Pershing аnd Rangers which are superior to Shoock Troops in range and damage (plus self-healing on the 2nd level of vet). After the Soviets overnerf - the US is simply a god in their background
Posts: 2066
Posts: 2066
Just a question as I haven't played allies in 1v1 for a long time.
Kübelwagenspam is really a thing?!
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Snipers eventually become a very significant problem for USF lategame but early on there are a lot of ways to play around and minimise the effect of the sniper.
Now tell me how you get outperfomred by ostheer early game as usf
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
The best way to deal with the Ostheer sniper is with an indirect fire, a lucky mortar shot, a lucky pack shot, a lucky M8A1 shot...
Posts: 1220
Posts: 1220
Posts: 808
USF is for early or mid or lategame someone tell me ? Because they suck in evry stage of game
USF vs OST OK. but versus OKW its joke how okw is better in evry way
Posts: 1220
stop being deluded ffs, USF is powerful in both early and mid game. Just late game ther weak because jackson is burdened to do all the AT
8 | |||||
38 | |||||
13 |