Well done on demonstrating your complete inability to respond to a point made instead of resorting to an ad hominem attack.
My reply was related to the common sense .... just like my playercard shows.
that card and sense are 2 incompatible things.
WBP 1.7
29 Jan 2017, 16:04 PM
#61
Posts: 1487
that card and sense are 2 incompatible things.
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
29 Jan 2017, 16:42 PM
#62
Posts: 3053
The Centaur already is far more Lethal Luch.
In addition it has an almost unique weapon that completely ignores yellow cover and is only partially affect by green.
This unique ability to almost ignore cover allows it to engage even ATG frontally and to wipe them out and be lethal vs AT infantry.
Imo there is nothing in the units to justify ignoring cover.
(Centaur does not suppress by the way.)
Oh for some reason I thought it did suppress. My bad (I never even use the thing).
The centaur is far more costly and arrives a tier later than luchs. It's also slower and comes INSTEAD of a medium (10 fuel more for cromwell). What the centaur does is somewhat irrelevant to luchs because they are totaly different units.
| Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
29 Jan 2017, 16:51 PM
#63
Posts: 327
that card and sense are 2 incompatible things.
Please don't mix up my words from two different paragraphs with one another and claim you have made a point. It's no better than what the other user did in reply. If you can't do better than that, nobody's forcing you to stoop so low in your attempts.
29 Jan 2017, 16:57 PM
#64
Posts: 1487
that card makes whatever you say irrelevant. And you still dont get even this. Generaly 1000+ are pisspoor players lacking basic abilities. That was true even year ago when playerbase was larger
| Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
29 Jan 2017, 17:09 PM
#65
Posts: 327
that card makes whatever you say irrelevant. And you still dont get even this. Generaly 1000+ are pisspoor players lacking basic abilities. That was true even year ago when playerbase was larger
That is such amazing analysis on why making three units irrelevant by giving all their weapons to a fourth one is not great for balance or unit usage. You must have spent months on that stellar effort.
And that's beside the point that what you did in your previous comment is twisting other person's words to fit your agenda -- that is exactly what makes your points debatable at best starting the moment you do that.
29 Jan 2017, 18:03 PM
#66
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
That is such amazing analysis on why making three units irrelevant by giving all their weapons to a fourth one is not great for balance or unit usage. You must have spent months on that stellar effort.
Can you enumerate those 3 units and explain how you used Penals in WBP in a way that makes those other 3 units feel irrelevant?
You have a great idea that improves the QoL aspects of the game? Please, drop your idea here:
https://www.coh2.org/topic/57860/some-qol-suggestions
Check out Cruzz's DPS calculator:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing
(Download the file, open it with your browser)
https://www.coh2.org/topic/57860/some-qol-suggestions
Check out Cruzz's DPS calculator:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing
(Download the file, open it with your browser)
29 Jan 2017, 18:20 PM
#67
Posts: 1158
the AEC can immobilize!? I never see Brit players use it.
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
29 Jan 2017, 18:21 PM
#68
Posts: 327
Can you enumerate those 3 units and explain how you used Penals in WBP in a way that makes those other 3 units feel irrelevant?
I think you misread where this "discussion" originated from. It began by me responding to a post that said Penals being an all-rounder (flanking+mainline) infantry through access to different kinds of upgrades (which was tested in previous iterations but is not the case in 1.7) is a desirable balancing method. I responded by saying enabling them to be Swiss Army Knife would make other Soviet infantry (Shocks who are considered a flanking squad and Conscripts/Guards who are core/elite mainline unit) redundant, in addition to removing all historical reference from Penals, something I had commented on previously before they were made reverted to be less all-capable by your team, which I'm grateful for.
That discussion later degenerated into ad hominem attacks by another user who decided twisting my words to suit their agenda was a great decision as they were incapable of countering the point made.
29 Jan 2017, 18:49 PM
#69
Posts: 299
the AEC can immobilize!? I never see Brit players use it.
It was bugged in the live version since release, they have now fixed it.
| Playercard of RtN.Con | |||||||||||||||||||
|
29 Jan 2017, 20:09 PM
#70
Posts: 2243
Yes..a vet5 luchs is strong with it supression.
But...if u managed it to get a vet 5 luchs ....u deserve it to get a a good supression platform cause ur mg34 is crap.
a luchs can easy be killed...expacily if it vet5 (at this time u should have 2-3 tanks and much AT as allie) cause it should be at 25-35min.
where is there price, if u managed to save this light tank?
But...if u managed it to get a vet 5 luchs ....u deserve it to get a a good supression platform cause ur mg34 is crap.
a luchs can easy be killed...expacily if it vet5 (at this time u should have 2-3 tanks and much AT as allie) cause it should be at 25-35min.
where is there price, if u managed to save this light tank?
29 Jan 2017, 21:45 PM
#71
Posts: 1225
Make sure you delete the additional weaponslots for Rangers. The amount of DPS you can get with Bar/thompson makes the unit broken as fuck.
29 Jan 2017, 21:59 PM
#72
Posts: 773
If a particular bug is affecting an already overpowered unit which is out of scope, we won't be adding it in. An example of that would be British tank hull MGs having a narrower arc than other tanks (Does Comet really need any more help at killing infantry?).
What about fixing fast cap abilities such as the Vanguard
29 Jan 2017, 23:34 PM
#73
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
What about fixing fast cap abilities such as the Vanguard and the OKW one, these allow squads to cap points even whilst completely suppressed so long as the ability is active. Could this be fixed? It's easy to replicate and I imagine is just 1 string addition to the files...
Except suppression has never affected capture rate. Only getting pinned denies the ability to capture so you probably won't see these abilities adjusted, even in the future when versing suppression.
30 Jan 2017, 02:20 AM
#74
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Make sure you delete the additional weaponslots for Rangers. The amount of DPS you can get with Bar/thompson makes the unit broken as fuck.
Shit, I thought I was the only one... +1 on this
Except suppression has never affected capture rate. Only getting pinned denies the ability to capture so you probably won't see these abilities adjusted, even in the future when versing suppression.
Once a squad is pinned they stop capping. +1
Mr. Smith, what is the true scope looking like now mate?
30 Jan 2017, 02:28 AM
#75
Posts: 51
What about fixing fast cap abilities such as the Vanguard and the OKW one, these allow squads to cap points even whilst completely suppressed so long as the ability is active. Could this be fixed? It's easy to replicate and I imagine is just 1 string addition to the files...
OKW one is not cap, only for decap.
30 Jan 2017, 03:43 AM
#76
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
i have always seen cons as a defensive support squad which are to be used in conjunction with support weapons or tanks instead
similar to the volx from coh1. that's also the reason you can build them in t0. because you should use them as support for your penals / support weapons and not as sole attackers
actually i find the Basic design of coh2 extremely smart and astonishingly awesome
+1.
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
30 Jan 2017, 03:53 AM
#77
Posts: 773
Except suppression has never affected capture rate. Only getting pinned denies the ability to capture so you probably won't see these abilities adjusted, even in the future when versing suppression.
except being fully suppressed E.G unable to move the squad, red supression, forced to retreat, STILL allows you to cap/decap.
30 Jan 2017, 04:02 AM
#78
Posts: 773
OKW one is not cap, only for decap.
EDIT: just tested and that ability seems to not for OKW work when fully suppressed, I'm guessing memory failed me here I could have sworn Dane witnessed it with OKW in a game cast.
The Vanguard ability still caps however
30 Jan 2017, 08:53 AM
#79
Posts: 118
What about commanders and commander units? no hope for them in the near future?
30 Jan 2017, 09:53 AM
#80
Posts: 1355
that card makes whatever you say irrelevant. And you still dont get even this. Generaly 1000+ are pisspoor players lacking basic abilities. That was true even year ago when playerbase was larger
Where is your Playercard to make relevant what you are saying?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
94 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
66 | ||
|
|
|
|
38 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
813 users are online:
813 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM