Definitely KV-2 then also. And OKW base emplacement (buildable). Assault grens.
I think KV-8 must also be listed. It is a rare visitor in the game
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Definitely KV-2 then also. And OKW base emplacement (buildable). Assault grens.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2742
Posts: 3
Posts: 249
What are you all thinking? does anyone really play the OH?
No one of you mentioned the MOST USELESS TANK INGAME, the Ostwind, he needs a horrific buff, he NEVER shoots elsewhere but the ground, while the centaur of the brits eradicates infantry in seconds. I dont need a tank just for shooting down a plane, thats bullshit, he needs to kill infantry. INCREASE the accuracy of him dramatically
next is the PAK43, ALL emplacements of the brits, i repeat ALL OF THEM, cannot lose their crew. while it only takes ONE little fart in its general direction to be destroyed or to get its crew killed instantly.
next is, the WORST heavy tank in the game is the tiger, the normal tiger, no one, literally NO ONE builds it outside of 1v1, it is horrible, its accuracy is terrible, it is easily penetrated by everything else while being slow (being slow is what is ok but the rest is plain bullshit).
the last thing that needs a look at (but this is optional) is the Railgun - Schwerer Gustav, bombardement, it takes too long and the brits have the same thing only better, while no one ever had a bigger gun than this, that means for the long time the projectiles fly the explosion radius needs to be improved dramatically OR you dont need flares to indicate where it shoots, choose.
Posts: 3
The things you listed are bad, not awful. I'm speccificly talking about things that are awful right now and should receive a fix sooner or later.
(tiger should be treated like a elephant honestly. Its a tank- hunter, not an invinceble warmachine.)
Posts: 44
Posts: 431
Posts: 249
no, they are not bad, they are terrible
how am i supposed to use the tiger as a tankdestroyer when he lacks the range, the accuracy and the vision of such? every cheap ally tank like the su-85, the firefly which will be on the map 10 minutes before you even can summon the tiger and thus will certainly have several vets, will feast on him and that is supposed to be a doctrinal call in? he is just useless at everything he is supposed to do
Posts: 3
Look. Your incapability to properly use a Tiger 1 does not equal the tiger being "terrible". I've found a tiger to be a great detterent against every medium in the game, and a challemge against every heavy. TD's should be avoided or flanked.
(A firefly in 10 minutes? What???)
Posts: 249
you dont play anything besides 1v1 or even 2v2 do you? he has no chance against the cheaper tankdestroyers of the allies, period.
and i said "10 minutes before you even can summon the tiger" which is true, not to mean that the next thing is common but i had a match last times where the brits had a firefly around 10 minutes or 15
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1217
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I think with the power creep the Western Armies brought to the game and the second power creep that the Brits brought (for the Allies exclusively), heavy vehicles need an overhaul completely. Mind you that mostly the old armies (Ostheer and Soviets) have access to those heavy call in vechicles (ISU-152, KV-2, IS-2, Tiger I, Elefant).
At this point I think the limit of only having one on the field at a time could be reverted. This was needed when SU-85s, Su-76s, M36s and StuGs weren´t buffed and there were no Fireflies or Comets around.
Currently heavy tanks are little more than a medium.
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
I think with the power creep the Western Armies brought to the game and the second power creep that the Brits brought (for the Allies exclusively), heavy vehicles need an overhaul completely. Mind you that mostly the old armies (Ostheer and Soviets) have access to those heavy call in vechicles (ISU-152, KV-2, IS-2, Tiger I, Elefant).
At this point I think the limit of only having one on the field at a time could be reverted. This was needed when SU-85s, Su-76s, M36s and StuGs weren´t buffed and there were no Fireflies or Comets around.
Currently heavy tanks are little more than a medium.
Posts: 96 | Subs: 1
Double ISU 152 again / double IS2 / Double Tigers, yeaaaaah great tiiime ;D
wait, you was serious ?
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Actually why not? if u look at brits, comets are so spammable while they perform even better than tigers or is2.
Posts: 96 | Subs: 1
As far as i remember, you have at least to tech to go Comet
And double ISU 152 is not fun at all go play against
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
So ur saying u dont have to tech if ur using call ins? And also, have u seen isu152 lately? its nowhere near as good as brummbar for example.
76 | |||||
27 | |||||
7 | |||||
6 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
0 |