Login

russian armor

Locked Limey Trenches

24 Jan 2017, 22:10 PM
#21
avatar of Obersoldat

Posts: 393



Yep that's the answer - only buidable on friendly territory and with same target size as wehr bunkers.


Seems like a easy fix, but probably out of scope. :guyokay:
24 Jan 2017, 23:33 PM
#22
avatar of DAZ187

Posts: 466



Seems like a easy fix, but probably out of scope. :guyokay:


Build a bunker its x3 the cost :snfPeter: but allies cant enter it lol
25 Jan 2017, 01:19 AM
#23
avatar of Nubb3r

Posts: 141

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jan 2017, 23:33 PMDAZ187


Build a bunker its x3 the cost :snfPeter: but allies cant enter it lol


I wouldn't care about that, but bunkers die from 3 pak shots. Hilarious.
25 Jan 2017, 04:17 AM
#24
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

Brit trenches are the second dumbest mechanic in the game and easily the most abusable. Ie. push early game on cutoff, build trench, occupy with Vickers, voila, gg. Really fun gameplay ensues.

Not like you can just go on the side and attack it with whatever the fuck you please (stgs and flame nades anyone?). Or just make a mortar if you're wehr. Still, should be more hittable by something. Not sure if at weapons should counter a unit garrison buildable though. Bunkers are a little different because they turn into autonomous mg emplacements for 0 pop, some mp and a somewhat high muni cost. Trenches are reliant on a garrisoning vickers, which means your vickers can't be anywhere else.
25 Jan 2017, 06:24 AM
#25
avatar of TickTack

Posts: 578

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jan 2017, 16:30 PMWalther
Becouse they are checking if you have british passport before you are let in. Trenches in current form are stupid as fuck, they are 5 x times harder to destroy with raketen or pak, not to mention raketen is really bad counter since vickers in trench can outrange it...

... Try attacking it from the side
25 Jan 2017, 09:15 AM
#26
avatar of Obersoldat

Posts: 393

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jan 2017, 23:33 PMDAZ187


Build a bunker its x3 the cost :snfPeter: but allies cant enter it lol


Target size 2 vs 26 :snfPeter:
25 Jan 2017, 09:44 AM
#27
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2243

make a poll about this...i bet the brit lovers come and tell you that is fine...cause the have a bad mg...and they need the trench to deal with all the OP infantery from ost Oo
25 Jan 2017, 10:07 AM
#28
avatar of Blalord

Posts: 742 | Subs: 1



Target size 2 vs 26 :snfPeter:


and buildable in ennemy territory
25 Jan 2017, 16:32 PM
#29
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225

"Attacking trenches from the side", as far as bizarre suggestions go, that takes the cake.
25 Jan 2017, 16:53 PM
#30
avatar of Stunner

Posts: 11

"Attacking trenches from the side", as far as bizarre suggestions go, that takes the cake.

Was this supposed to be a joke?
26 Jan 2017, 00:57 AM
#31
avatar of DustBucket

Posts: 114

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Jan 2017, 16:53 PMStunner

Was this supposed to be a joke?


one can only hope
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

466 users are online: 466 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49884
Welcome our newest member, Buchl759
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM