Would it? besides the abilities on infantry, would COH2 just play much better without abilities such as off maps or tank stuns/disable abilities? Artillery abilities only from build-able howitzers?
I'm tired of the company of abilities. Team games just become a huge mess from them.
Would coh2 be better without abilities
13 Oct 2016, 20:47 PM
#1
Posts: 236
13 Oct 2016, 21:17 PM
#2
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Would it? besides the abilities on infantry, would COH2 just play much better without abilities such as off maps or tank stuns/disable abilities? Artillery abilities only from build-able howitzers?
I'm tired of the company of abilities. Team games just become a huge mess from them.
try Dawn of war 2 and starcraft then
13 Oct 2016, 21:25 PM
#3
Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1
try Dawn of war 2 and starcraft then
*DoW II fanboi internet rage intensifies* Dawn of War II has more abilities than CoH 2 though, and more diverse ones, it's just lacking for off-maps, which seeing how CoH 2 has handled them, is a welcome thing.
The internal battery has run dry, the game can now be played. However, clock based events will no longer occur.
13 Oct 2016, 22:00 PM
#4
Posts: 930
How about cutting your opponent munitions so he can't use abilities all the time?
13 Oct 2016, 22:33 PM
#5
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
WHAT!? How can you just imagine the T-34 without ramming! 
14 Oct 2016, 21:24 PM
#6
Posts: 181
It would be boring and will be a drastic deviation from what CoH is all about.
15 Oct 2016, 00:16 AM
#7
Posts: 2742
How about cutting your opponent munitions so he can't use abilities all the time?
Needs more strat points.
Needs strat points at all.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
15 Oct 2016, 01:05 AM
#8
Posts: 401
No... I need my Close the Pocket against camping noobs... yeah, no!
15 Oct 2016, 05:03 AM
#9
Posts: 455
To be fair, you were playing team games.
Anything can happen in team games.
Aside from that, the proposition would kill a unit's utility like the Stuart, Puma, Pak40, or the StuG. I could list many more units that could be affected by this, but you get the idea. The change would be so drastic that it would end up like Command and Conquer. Even then, that series has abilities and off-maps.
Anything can happen in team games.
Aside from that, the proposition would kill a unit's utility like the Stuart, Puma, Pak40, or the StuG. I could list many more units that could be affected by this, but you get the idea. The change would be so drastic that it would end up like Command and Conquer. Even then, that series has abilities and off-maps.
15 Oct 2016, 11:32 AM
#10
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Wait, you mean active or passive abilities?
I'm guessing you mean active, so yeah, like others have said, you'd just get a hell of a dull and boring gameplay.
If you mean without commanders, there are mods for that.
I'm guessing you mean active, so yeah, like others have said, you'd just get a hell of a dull and boring gameplay.
If you mean without commanders, there are mods for that.
15 Oct 2016, 15:25 PM
#11
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
I think there should be a distinction between abilities and well implemented abilities. Stuff like how Close Air Support commander was stupid OP for a while there and once the offmaps were toned down its in a serviceable place. Same thing with the Brit Tactical Cover Arty - for a while it was ALL you saw but now its still useful but not terrible. The list goes on.
I think abilities are important because they reward good micro and give you more strategic options. Could many of them be tweaked further? You bet, but I doubt getting rid of them would make COH better.
I think abilities are important because they reward good micro and give you more strategic options. Could many of them be tweaked further? You bet, but I doubt getting rid of them would make COH better.
15 Oct 2016, 16:01 PM
#12
Posts: 2742
Close the Pocket was powerful for about a week when no one knew what it did. It was a troll commander for Faceoff at Rostov pretty much.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
17 Oct 2016, 23:07 PM
#13
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Close the Pocket was powerful for about a week when no one knew what it did. It was a troll commander for Faceoff at Rostov pretty much.
Dude, it's far from a troll commander... If it's done right, it punishes severe overextension.
I have won 3 games via this "Troll" commander out of 5 that I have used it.
One of them was General Mud mind you.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
94 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
133 | ||
|
|
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
1020 users are online:
1020 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM