hi,
there is a slight bug in the playercards:
https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197984330863
as you can see, he has one win and 14 losses with soviets, but a winrate of 0.67, but actually it should be 0.067
slight bug in playercards
29 Aug 2016, 14:47 PM
#1
1 
Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
“Ha! They're scratching your paint job, Helmut!”
29 Aug 2016, 14:54 PM
#2
5 
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Wow great find. THOSE DAMN LEADING ZEROES.
Maybe Janne or Seb can sniff this one out.
Maybe Janne or Seb can sniff this one out.
29 Aug 2016, 15:44 PM
#3
Posts: 86
It should also be said that the "%" column is incorrect.
The numbers should be multiplied by 100 to be a percentage.
Currently it's a ratio.
The numbers should be multiplied by 100 to be a percentage.
Currently it's a ratio.
29 Aug 2016, 15:56 PM
#4
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Well that was a design choice. We use .000-1.000 so that they look like batting averages like in MLB professional baseball. I'm a baseball fan 
It would be more clear if it said ".AVG" instead of "%" in the header, but we never bothered with that.
It would be more clear if it said ".AVG" instead of "%" in the header, but we never bothered with that.
29 Aug 2016, 16:47 PM
#5
Posts: 86
Interesting, I am not familiar with baseball unfortunately.
I hesitated to make that remark because it seemed like it was like this for a reason.
I hesitated to make that remark because it seemed like it was like this for a reason.
29 Aug 2016, 19:06 PM
#6
Posts: 3709 | Subs: 2
That should be fixed now, coded it much better.
Let me know if you spot any other wrong result.
I also renamed the column to Ratio. Should it be an even more explicit Win-Rate instead?
Let me know if you spot any other wrong result.
I also renamed the column to Ratio. Should it be an even more explicit Win-Rate instead?
29 Aug 2016, 19:29 PM
#7
1 Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
That should be fixed now
can confirm that
Let me know if you spot any other wrong result.
i doubt it, that just happened by accident. This guy drophacked against us which explains the difference between his 1v1 and 4v4 ratios
I also renamed the column to Ratio. Should it be an even more explicit Win-Rate instead?
if its not too broad and doesnt look stupid, i would do that.
“Ha! They're scratching your paint job, Helmut!”
29 Aug 2016, 19:38 PM
#8
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Wow Seb, nice! 
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
38 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
70 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.943410.697+9
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.269143.653+2
- 10.10629.785+7
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1266
Board Info
826 users are online:
826 guests
1 post in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
29 posts in the last month
10 posts in the last week
29 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50049
Welcome our newest member, five88vicom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, five88vicom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM