Ostheer Panther Moving Accuracy

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 139

Give me Jagdpanther. Kappa

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

Also / alternatively, standardize reload so we can stop micro more effectively ( it means we'd have stop accuracy while practically on the move if we time it right

)

Dear Lord, teach me to be generous; to give and not count the cost; to fight and not heed the wounds; to work and ask for no reward, save that of knowing I am doing Your will.
Argumentation, disagreement, and debate are critical for success.
The most important type of diversity is viewpoint diversity.

Multi Quote

Posts: 92

4 Jul 2016, 22:35 PMClerv

-1

I think the replies here have raised logical valid points on the current state of play. The axis tanks appear balanced this way for a reason.

Lol fat carnt glad he's out of politics.

Posts: 509

+1 OP its a change long requested

Posts: 728

mmm no not with out some sacrifice to frontal armor or speed it is still plenty capable of chasing down tanks especially injured ones even missing some shots. Great survivabilty with blitzkreig race car reverse, optional smoke, and great frontal armor. I mean it can even get snarred and out run at infantry that would be broken as shit it would chase everything down with little risk.

Posts: 728

4 Jul 2016, 12:25 PMkitekaze

Weird, my friend, who is top player, complaint why StuG and Brummbar are UP but Panther is opposite.

But while we are at this topic, I would like to mention some stats about moving accuracy.

Soviet
SU-76, T34-76, SU-85, T34-85, KV1: 0.5 <- Suffer same thing with German tank
Sherman: 0.75

USF
Sherman, M4A3E8, M10, M36: 0.75 <- USF feature for paper armor or pea-shooting gun

UKF
Firefly, Churchill: 0.75 <- Kind of understandable
Cromwell, Comet: 0.75 <-What the... Relic copy-paste make these vehicles too useful for chasing

German
All except OKW panther: 0.5
OKW panther(not command tank): 0.65

As for me, I would rise all vehicle moving acc to 0.6, while nerf UKF moving acc to 0.6 at the same time.

The problem comes then all those allied vehicles you mentioned have a terrible chance to pen the front of the panther or don't pen it that great. I use the comet all the time its not unusual for it to bounce 3 shots in a row. Panther on the other hand has a small chance that the comet will bounce. It doesen't matter how fast you fire if you can't pen the tanks your fighting.

Edit* thought you were comparing reload not accuracy on the move my fault

Posts: 50

5 Jul 2016, 04:03 AMjugglerman

Lol fat carnt glad he's out of politics.

haha you from Oz too?

Posts: 414

It's fine as is, as long as it gets a 20 fuel reduction.

Posts: 92

6 Jul 2016, 22:29 PMClerv

haha you from Oz too?

Land of substandard internets- lucky CHO2 doesn't need that much bandwidth.

Posts: 1930

Short version: No

long version:

I am starting to hate how the high moving accuracy trivialize the importance of shoot and scoot. The sherman's gun stabilizer were primitive and fragile. Most tank crew removed it.

There's a definite power creep as a result of the UKF tanks, but I am oppose to buffing the axis tank to meet them. Some of the gun state on the UKF tank should be nerf.

Lastly, the panther would benefit more with a faster reload speed. Its 50 range is wasted since the panther should be in the front, not sniping from the bank. Even the comet's 50 range is questionable.