Anti-tank grenade

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 141

I think that the USF AT-nade underperforms because it have a minimum and sometimes the nade can take 3-4 seconds to launch. Compared to the panzerfaust, the nade is clearly UP. I suggest to remove the minimum range and lower the aim time for the nade. What's your thought on this?

Posts: 238

I think they should replace it with the classic sticky nade and giving it not a instant impact blow but maybe like .5 second to blow it once hitting the tank. this would get rid of the minimal range.

I feel it woould be less buggy. They can even use the model of cons AT nades but change the look.

Playercard of Skabinsk

2v2: P	streak: + 2	with Jadame
3v3: P	streak: + 46	with Brayalex., & Jadame
3v3: P	streak: + 3	with Brayalex., & G.dot
4v4: P	streak: + 132	with Brayalex., Jadame, & G.dot

Multi Quote

Posts: 794

No.

USF AT-Nade is quite OP and its range must be shorter than that of the other factions, as the same unit can carry a zook or is always accompanied by the free captain.

Imagine if PGrens had panzerfaust.

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

21 Feb 2016, 19:54 PMPencilBatRation

No.

USF AT-Nade is quite OP and its range must be shorter than that of the other factions, as the same unit can carry a zook or is always accompanied by the free captain.

Imagine if PGrens had panzerfaust.

That reasoning makes very little sense at best.

Posts: 5279

21 Feb 2016, 19:54 PMPencilBatRation

No.

USF AT-Nade is quite OP and its range must be shorter than that of the other factions, as the same unit can carry a zook or is always accompanied by the free captain.

Imagine if PGrens had panzerfaust.

Imagine if shrekked pgrens had a chance to bounce...

Posts: 141

21 Feb 2016, 19:06 PMSkabinsk

I think they should replace it with the classic sticky nade and giving it not a instant impact blow but maybe like .5 second to blow it once hitting the tank. this would get rid of the minimal range.

I feel it woould be less buggy. They can even use the model of cons AT nades but change the look.

That would be a good idea.

Posts: 141

21 Feb 2016, 19:54 PMPencilBatRation

No.

USF AT-Nade is quite OP and its range must be shorter than that of the other factions, as the same unit can carry a zook or is always accompanied by the free captain.

Imagine if PGrens had panzerfaust.

I imagine that you must face a lot of bazzoka equipped rifleman...

Posts: 290

You must understand that it's choice & option for USF. For Wehrmacht there is only 2 units that get shreck (1 is commander only). And we have only 2 commanders call-in that give mobile AT and StugE for me is bad at AT, more anti-infantry unit with soft AT.

ps. It's not like USF riflemen can't play with 1 bar & 1 bazooka in their units...

Posts: 1221

bazzoka spam OP as hell rifles can easily kill KT !

Posts: 552

Rifle nade has no problems, very gud.

Posts: 609

Minimum range, long cast animation and 40 less pen then a panzerfaust which grens get as stock? Sounds legit.

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

They need to improve the animation too. It's a problem when I tell my own troops to snare the enemy and I can't even tell if they are doing it or not until it fires.

Posts: 141

21 Feb 2016, 21:44 PMTobis

They need to improve the animation too. It's a problem when I tell my own troops to snare the enemy and I can't even tell if they are doing it or not until it fires.

Yeah, Relic definitly need to do that.