The timing is off IMO, it is the only HMG which can be built at 5-6 min mark and is rather expensive, can be countered quite easily and simply put, it doesn't cut it. Once in T1, its cost can be raised to 300MP in order to prevent the creation of USF maxim spam meta.
It can help diversifying the faction and giving them the tool they need to counter aggressive Kubel+Sturm douchbaggery.
[USF]Move the .50 to Tier 1 (aka HQ)
16 Feb 2016, 22:57 PM
#1
Posts: 794
16 Feb 2016, 23:05 PM
#2
Posts: 1891
Nope. Maybe if you locked it being a side research in Barracks, and added mortar to T1.
Riflemen+ HMG could push Axis off the map and rush an AA track to win every game.
Riflemen+ HMG could push Axis off the map and rush an AA track to win every game.
16 Feb 2016, 23:29 PM
#3
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Nope. Maybe if you locked it being a side research in Barracks, and added mortar to T1.
Riflemen+ HMG could push Axis off the map and rush an AA track to win every game.
M2HB is definitely a bit too good to be available immediately. Even if it is underperforming a bit right now, its arc and set-up time are good enough to pull off suppressing would-be flankers better than Maxims. Though I'd still be in favour of it and ATG being available at HQ after either Capt. or LT with sufficient Rifle nerfs.
ALSO GIVE T0 MORTAR, YES!
16 Feb 2016, 23:33 PM
#4
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
grens in t0 also? why dont put maxim in t0 when we are at it?
16 Feb 2016, 23:34 PM
#5
Posts: 915
I like this idea. You have to t ch lt to get it and cpt is the more successful meta
17 Feb 2016, 00:32 AM
#6
Posts: 15
Or add a weapon support center like in coh1, with sniper mg and mortar.
17 Feb 2016, 01:44 AM
#7
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Or add a weapon support center like in coh1, with sniper mg and mortar.
I really want to yell your account name at you.
17 Feb 2016, 02:34 AM
#8
Posts: 1930
The timing is off IMO, it is the only HMG which can be built at 5-6 min mark
50 fuels takes 5 minutes to get? the british can get an AEC out in six minutes.
17 Feb 2016, 04:45 AM
#9
Posts: 824
Put in T0 but require Capt or LT to unlock it and put mortar in Lt tier.
17 Feb 2016, 06:16 AM
#10
Posts: 39
yes usf needs tier 0 hmg
17 Feb 2016, 07:31 AM
#11
8
Posts: 2470
i voted no for two reasons. one, i don't see it as fixing USF's issues in countering garrisons and HMGs prior to teching. two, i think that in combination with RET spam it would be OP.
i do want USF to get a t0 mortar
i do want USF to get a t0 mortar
17 Feb 2016, 19:12 PM
#12
Posts: 794
So 2x 260MP MG42s supported by ostruppen are okay, 4X 240MP maxims supported by flamer CEs are ok, but a single 300MP .50 supported by REs would be OP?
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
58 | |||||
36 | |||||
3 | |||||
105 | |||||
21 | |||||
18 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.830222.789+36
- 2.564205.733+1
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.916404.694-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.721440.621+3
- 8.14758.717+1
- 9.17046.787-1
- 10.1019662.606+4
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1225
Board Info
339 users are online:
339 guests
0 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
6 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48954
Welcome our newest member, cnwpscom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, cnwpscom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM