Login

russian armor

New British Helms Deep commanders

10 Feb 2016, 21:32 PM
#21
avatar of Angry Marine Dave

Posts: 62

That Mobile Assault looks crazy good, what the hell with P2W Relic? Other one looks interesting at least, would help Anvil and maybe see more emplacements.
10 Feb 2016, 21:33 PM
#22
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 20:56 PMButcher
People complained about annoying emplacements in Coh1.

Reintroduce them anyway and add an invincibility-button.

People complained about annoying emplacements in Coh2 and especially about brace.

Now make it even worse by introducing improved emplacements that can be repaired and built more easily.

Are you kidding me? Do you want to destroy this game? How the fuck is it going to be enjoyable to play against someone sitting around?

That bearded dude shall hereby be known as the "Cancer Commander".


+100000 to all you said!!!
10 Feb 2016, 21:48 PM
#23
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

10 Feb 2016, 22:02 PM
#24
avatar of pugzii

Posts: 513

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 20:56 PMButcher
People complained about annoying emplacements in Coh1.

Reintroduce them anyway and add an invincibility-button.

People complained about annoying emplacements in Coh2 and especially about brace.

Now make it even worse by introducing improved emplacements that can be repaired and built more easily.

Are you kidding me? Do you want to destroy this game? How the fuck is it going to be enjoyable to play against someone sitting around?

That bearded dude shall hereby be known as the "Cancer Commander".


game went to shit when they released forward retreat points anyway
10 Feb 2016, 22:09 PM
#25
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

They look nice. When can I buy them?
10 Feb 2016, 22:29 PM
#26
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
Looks like Barton or Price can win ESl with there pio spam with this new docs :D.p.
We need more love to vanilla BibleThump.
10 Feb 2016, 22:34 PM
#27
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 21:27 PMVonIvan
First commander is going to counter Snipers, blow up blobs, give free cover at the cost of munis, and allow royal engineer flamer spam. Second commander looks useless besides the added emplacement bonus. :foreveralone:
P2W :banana:


Free cover at the cost of munitions. So not free then.
10 Feb 2016, 22:43 PM
#28
avatar of Night

Posts: 77

Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 21:09 PMButcher
I have seen brace in action and it´s annoying. In fact I´m barely playing Axis at this point. It´s no rocket science that this is going to be even worse.

Emplacements have no fucking place in this game. It is about combined arms, mobility and flanking. Not sitting on your lazy ass.

The worst part is people complaining about that issue even in Coh1 and the total disregard of this critic. To add insult to injury emplacements get more and more annoying abilities.

Please. Give us a faction with veterancy that can be bought. It was total shit in coh1 and did not belong into the game. But that does not matter, huh?


Bestest reply ever.

"This game is about combined arms , mobility and flanking"

Combined? OKW and USF? Kappa Keepo
Flanking? :D :D :D

Dudelino al pacino, this game SHOULD be about these things, but isn't.
Emplacements are cool but they shouldn't get better.
10 Feb 2016, 22:54 PM
#29
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
Why brits general have beard ?
I dont 100 % but thay can not have beard ? This guy look like Friedrich III.
10 Feb 2016, 22:54 PM
#30
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21



Free cover at the cost of munitions. So not free then.

Free in the fact that you don't have to build any cover. :foreveralone:
10 Feb 2016, 23:04 PM
#31
avatar of Doggo

Posts: 148

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 21:09 PMButcher
Emplacements have no fucking place in this game. It is about combined arms, mobility and flanking. Not sitting on your lazy ass.


The British Empire Army in real life, during WW2 was one of the most formidable armies that preferred a strong defense. The faction is keeping in line with history.
10 Feb 2016, 23:04 PM
#32
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

Going to enjoy the Land Mattress to its fullest extent.

3v3 all Brit team is gonna be amazing now.


jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 23:04 PMDoggo


The British Empire Army in real life, during WW2 was one of the most formidable armies that preferred a strong defense. The faction is keeping in line with history.


Well, they defended when necessary, but the British late war army was a fully mechanised, highly mobile striking force that advanced at the same rapid pace as the Americans, often utilising a lot of the same equipment and supply lines. 'Static' isn't really something I would associate with them in 1945.
10 Feb 2016, 23:08 PM
#33
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653



Free cover at the cost of munitions. So not free then.[/quote

OP as hell
10 Feb 2016, 23:12 PM
#34
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

Wow, still no new Ostheer commander?
10 Feb 2016, 23:14 PM
#35
avatar of TNrg

Posts: 640

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 23:04 PMDoggo


The British Empire Army in real life, during WW2 was one of the most formidable armies that preferred a strong defense. The faction is keeping in line with history.


Did you know that the british attacked germans in Europe with mortar pits and bofors barrages from their little island? :megusta:
10 Feb 2016, 23:16 PM
#36
avatar of Nick Banana

Posts: 96

new commanders picture are horrible
10 Feb 2016, 23:34 PM
#37
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 23:04 PMDoggo


The British Empire Army in real life, during WW2 was one of the most formidable armies that preferred a strong defense. The faction is keeping in line with history.
I highly doubt Brits used WW1 tactics in 1944. You know what they were most formidable in? Advancing.
10 Feb 2016, 23:37 PM
#38
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 22:43 PMNight


Bestest reply ever.

"This game is about combined arms , mobility and flanking"

Combined? OKW and USF? Kappa Keepo
Flanking? :D :D :D

Dudelino al pacino, this game SHOULD be about these things, but isn't.
Emplacements are cool but they shouldn't get better.


OKW and USF actually IS about combined arms , mobility and flanking



but maybe not in your gamemodes
10 Feb 2016, 23:38 PM
#39
avatar of BlackKorp

Posts: 974 | Subs: 2

P2W like i predicted gg relic #e-sports ready :thumb:
10 Feb 2016, 23:39 PM
#40
avatar of Doggo

Posts: 148

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 23:34 PMButcher
I highly doubt Brits used WW1 tactics in 1944. You know what they were most formidable in? Advancing.


Montgomery was fond of holding back, and not advance till he had the correct three-to-one ratio to engage the foe.
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

809 users are online: 809 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM