Posts: 830 | Subs: 3
Forums are still TBD unfortunately but its looking like it might be closer to the end of Feb. Next update on Feb. 25th
Posts: 155
Posts: 2454 | Subs: 2
Posts: 830 | Subs: 3
Posts: 830 | Subs: 3
Posts: 63 | Subs: 1
Posts: 51
Posts: 323 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1248
1 Posts: 1276
News commanders ? Small balance adjustment ? Bug fixes ? In-game currency (Supply Points) ? In-game skin from War paint contest ? War Effort ? Return of Community Map Spotlight Rotation ?
What's your predictions ?
Posts: 4
Posts: 830 | Subs: 3
#HYPE #TuneInTomorrowOnTwitch
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Changing grenades so that they don't dohalf(25%!!!) damage to units in green cover when landing behind the squad in cover would be nice. The whole point of nades are to help infantry assault a position, and I feel this recent change lowers the skill ceiling and rewards players for doing less while making the unit in green cover much too powerful.
Also I heard that grenadier rifle nades ignore this aspect of the game, can anyone confirm this?
edit: just learned rifle nades act the same as any other explosive.
Still, the fact that now grenades only deal 25% damage is absurd, there's no reason to micro your units out of green cover now. What was the reason behind these changes?
Posts: 1220
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
good point, grenades are useally there to fight enemys in heavy cover. makes no sense.
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Grenades do less damage in cover to reward players in cover and help weapon teams survive single grenades. The reduced damage provides an obvious play/counterplay option. Flush them out of green cover and you can blast them with nades, otherwise you need to think carefully about when to drop the nade.
This is slightly different in buildings where proximity is of critical importance and facing changes, as well as size of the building, also come into play.
Nades are for assisting in squad breakthroughs not to be 30 munitions hand nukes.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
i think this will be another mediocre kyle gameplay and nothing else
Posts: 4
Grenades do less damage in cover to reward players in cover and help weapon teams survive single grenades. The reduced damage provides an obvious play/counterplay option. Flush them out of green cover and you can blast them with nades, otherwise you need to think carefully about when to drop the nade.
This is slightly different in buildings where proximity is of critical importance and facing changes, as well as size of the building, also come into play.
Nades are for assisting in squad breakthroughs not to be 30 munitions hand nukes.
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Okay, fair enough, but a 75% damage reduction still seems too steep. With the current mechanics a player using two rifle squads to assault an MG42 along the edges of its cone of fire won't do enough damage for 30 munitions to be worth the cost.
Posts: 640
If you want to have NO reduction vs heavy cover, there would be no reason to use cover again; ever.
 |
|
|
74 | ||
 |
|
|
118 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
