Keep it, it's unique. I wish the other armies had something unique about their veterancy systems, too.
THIS! You are returning the hope that there are some people here who want the game to be interesting not just a mirror like most other rtses.
Posts: 2885
Keep it, it's unique. I wish the other armies had something unique about their veterancy systems, too.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Vet 3 T34/85 is not a game winner.
Vet 5 Panther is.
Vet 3 SU85 is not a game winner.
Vet 5 JPIV is.
Vet 3 IS2 is not a game winner.
Vet 5 KT is.
Posts: 1108
Posts: 1617
most of the units needs a shitload of kills to reach vet5 (except volks)
KT 100+ kills? Stuka 70-80 kills? etc.
The only tanks I have seen in 2vs2 with vet5, are panthers,JP4 and Panzer 4
I vote its fine
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 365
I disagree about the vet 3 SU-85, that thing is a monster.
Posts: 284
Posts: 114
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Now there is a good chance I will get torn to shreds for this but, What about vet 5 on sovjets? Isn't the reason that the okw have vet 5 because they were drawn from the eastern front? If so wouldn't it make sense for their troops to be just as hardened? Might breathe a little life into the soviet faction and help many of their units which currently don't scale very well.
I would rather keep the vet 5 mechanic, it makes things more fun and interesting.
Posts: 114
Yeah, I don't think it needs to be gutted, just needs adjustments.
106 | |||||
36 | |||||
28 | |||||
9 | |||||
2 | |||||
200 | |||||
65 | |||||
22 | |||||
21 | |||||
18 |