There is recent match history at the ladder, just in case of that aggressive kiddo keep accusing me lying.
You said you beat Focus's rank 1 team, and you are obviously lying and I showed you how and why you are lying
Posts: 959
There is recent match history at the ladder, just in case of that aggressive kiddo keep accusing me lying.
Posts: 2779
You said you beat Focus's rank 1 team, and you are obviously lying and I showed you how and why you are lying
Posts: 707
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's the other way around.
If you play a bunch of games in a short period of time you're basically guaranteed to get a high rank unless you get insanely low ranked randoms opponents every single time. We got #6 as axis in 11 games without facing anyone over rank 50 (The rank 47 game was in the 3vs3 ladder). That's the level of competition on the ladder in team games.
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
You do realize your argument here contradict itself?
Sure, it can be done either way, but in the context of playing around 15 games only, (it's not spamming games), you can't expect to go up to Rank 1 without beating top teams multiple times. (and this is a fact from the match history)
Posts: 2779
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Im not quite sure if that's right, I Highly respect many top 10 players And their skills
You said you beat Focus's rank 1 team, and you are obviously lying and I showed you how and why you are lying
Posts: 707
I don't see how it contradicts itself. The easiest way by far to rank up in these game modes is start a new team and play 10 games without losing. This will guarantee you a hugely inflated ELO compared to what you would get by playing those same games with an already existing AT due to how the game predicts an ELO after 10 games with no losses.
If you get an initial ranking within rank 10 with 10 games, you are pretty much guaranteed to reach top 3 within 20 games no matter what kind of scrubs you get matched with as long as you keep winning.
I can't believe I'm wasting time on this, but ok lets look at your match history
vs rank 34 AT
vs rank 34 AT
vs rank 1638 2 man AT with 1 random
vs rank 18 AT
vs rank 3869 2 man AT with 1 random
vs unranked 3 man AT (rank ~1200 )
vs unranked 3 man AT (rank ~200)
vs unranked 3 man AT (rank ~200)
So you beat one decent team in the past 8 games, 5 games were completely free wins and two games (against same opponent) were games you were clearly favored in though opponent atleast had a chance to win.
Posts: 707
He beat these guys:
[ƒocus]™ Archangel Michael
Aracur
[ƒocus]™ JohnBravo
By looking at the playercard, it shows they have few games 13/2. It's quite possible they were top1 or close after leaving the qualifying games.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 615
Posts: 959
He beat these guys:
[ƒocus]™ Archangel Michael
Aracur
[ƒocus]™ JohnBravo
By looking at the playercard, it shows they have few games 13/2. It's quite possible they were top1 or close after leaving the qualifying games.
Posts: 2779
No man it's quite impossible because I have eyes on ladder too often everyday and I know those guys very well, they've never been on that rank anytime
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
I don't see how it contradicts itself. The easiest way by far to rank up in these game modes is start a new team and play 10 games without losing. This will guarantee you a hugely inflated ELO compared to what you would get by playing those same games with an already existing AT due to how the game predicts an ELO after 10 games with no losses.
If you get an initial ranking within rank 10 with 10 games, you are pretty much guaranteed to reach top 3 within 20 games no matter what kind of scrubs you get matched with as long as you keep winning.
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1653
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
1v1 and 2v2 a Luch is mostly of the time enough to counter the cheese, since the cheese comes a bit later with the new meta.
Posts: 1653
But... in 1s and 2s, if there is no UKF present, the Luchs is the very cheeze since OKW revamp
Posts: 1122
8 | |||||
232 | |||||
9 | |||||
7 | |||||
2 |