Login

russian armor

Sandbags vaulting minor issue

18 Jan 2016, 18:02 PM
#1
avatar of Muad'Dib

Posts: 368

Maybe not a bug per se, but currently British royal engineers cannot be ordered to vault a damaged sandbag since the default action is repair. This could obviously be problematic if the sandbag blocks off a passage. I don't remember if the issue exists with Sturmpioneers, soviet engineers and conscripts with repair kits (and these factions' corresponding sandbag walls).
In any case, the default action should probably be changed to vaulting, because repair can always be ordered from the control panel.
Only Relic postRelic 18 Jan 2016, 18:44 PM
#3
avatar of Cuddletronic
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 559 | Subs: 17

Maybe not a bug per se, but currently British royal engineers cannot be ordered to vault a damaged sandbag since the default action is repair. This could obviously be problematic if the sandbag blocks off a passage. I don't remember if the issue exists with Sturmpioneers, soviet engineers and conscripts with repair kits (and these factions' corresponding sandbag walls).
In any case, the default action should probably be changed to vaulting, because repair can always be ordered from the control panel.


Added Issue to database. Thanks
18 Jan 2016, 18:59 PM
#4
avatar of Skabinsk

Posts: 238

This issue in our data base already




:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
18 Jan 2016, 20:12 PM
#5
avatar of Muad'Dib

Posts: 368

Added Issue to database. Thanks


Thanks for the reply
18 Jan 2016, 21:10 PM
#6
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

they have huge buglist in their data base.
But what we got at jan 14?

Buffed AEC

Fix a building

Fix one bug.


So I am pretty sure they have this device:

18 Jan 2016, 21:26 PM
#7
avatar of Jaedrik

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

they have huge buglist in their data base.
But what we got at jan 14?

Buffed AEC

Fix a building

Fix one bug.


So I am pretty sure they have this device:



We share your frustration, but, IMO honesty and communication is always a better thing. Let's not bite the hand that feeds us? :D
18 Jan 2016, 21:30 PM
#9
avatar of Gumboot

Posts: 199

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jan 2016, 21:26 PMJaedrik


We share your frustration, but, IMO honesty and communication is always a better thing. Let's not bite the hand that feeds us? :D


We give them money for a product. We are doing the feeding.
19 Jan 2016, 02:26 AM
#10
avatar of Mistah_S

Posts: 851 | Subs: 1

While on this subject, I've had games against the AI where my allies will build sandbags on a bridge, which the AI treats as barbed wire.

Not game breaking or anything, but I did find it rather odd the AI didnt simply vault over and rape us from the side.
19 Jan 2016, 04:09 AM
#11
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470



Added Issue to database. Thanks


this is true of all repair units, including conscripts with the repair package.
19 Jan 2016, 05:24 AM
#12
avatar of Jaedrik

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jan 2016, 21:30 PMGumboot


We give them money for a product. We are doing the feeding.


Well...
N-no analogy is perfect.
You right, though.

The consumer should demand as quality a product or service as possible.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

873 users are online: 873 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49084
Welcome our newest member, sunwingamescom1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM