Heavy Tank Use

Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 20:34 PMedibleshrapnel

Bro do you even have the commander? Pershing performs quite nicely, solid main gun against tanks and infantry, 45 range, derpy armour, but lacklustre on health. Supported by a jackson or infantry, it can really clean up. It's no 1 tank army, and it's no king tiger, so l2p it.

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 12:53 PMIGOR

i would love if relic nerf its AI capabilities and make it unlimited like all other mediums , pershing does not perform like a true heavy and should not be limited because it kinda underperforms ( as a heavy tank that comes 13 cps and costs as much as all the other true heavys ) ... and yeah i do not have the commander,just saw in streams...

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 17:39 PMedibleshrapnel

I don't understand what you mean by "unlimited". You do realize that although the Pershing was designated as a heavy tank, it performed functions of both a heavy and medium tank. Originally, it was designated to be a medium tank, as it came out of the T 20 line of mediums, but was designated heavy to boost morale, as the Americans didn't' posses a heavy tank at the time. Where exactly do you believe it underperforms?

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 17:39 PMedibleshrapnel

I don't understand what you mean by "unlimited". You do realize that although the Pershing was designated as a heavy tank, it performed functions of both a heavy and medium tank. Originally, it was designated to be a medium tank, as it came out of the T 20 line of mediums, but was designated heavy to boost morale, as the Americans didn't' posses a heavy tank at the time. Where exactly do you believe it underperforms?

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 19:33 PMGenObi

Hey bro your wrong, the "heavy destination " was not for propaganda or "moral" it met the tank board requirements for a heavy as it was originally conceived as early as 1943 (and therefore those standards), it was designated a medium until after the war when a new line of heavy tanks where in design. Learn some tank history before spouting your nonsense and get rekt.

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 20:49 PMAustralian Magic

My argument is, it was designed as a medium, used as a heavy for few months and then became medium again.

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 20:52 PMGenObi

Well your wrong, if you read the materials I provide you will see that the last prototype of the series the T 23 was designated as the medium until they move up to the t 26 and later finalized as the m26 perishing.Heavy at birth, 're designated as medium as tech evolves, exact same thing as the British centurion tank when deployed in the 50s for the Israel defensive forces.

So like I said get your facts straight

Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 19:59 PMHans G. Schultz

but it still would be nice to still have have a final heavy tank phase where there could be multiple heavies on the field for those occasional 1 hour or longer games.

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 22:36 PMedibleshrapnel

Christ Genobi, when did you become such a History troll?

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 23:21 PMGenObi

Lol, if anything you should congratulate me for keeping my tongue for so long, i mean how many threads how incorrectly stated the Pershing history. In regards to the question on hand, yes it seems the pershing is somewhat to limited for the 1 pershing only call in. Two many pershing might be a problem, but a price and point requirment drop might be needed.

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 23:18 PMnodickwilliams

We should remove limit for pershing because we need call in meta back.

Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 23:41 PMedibleshrapnel

I congratulate your undying patience and tongue control