Shouldn't the T-34 be stronger than the Panzer IV?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of GGTeMpLaR"
Posts: 4
What strategies do I use for T-34 to be effective?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f349f/f349fdaa4476aad51984fe256ae2394e39f1a884" alt="avatar of TychoCelchuuu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f5d4/4f5d4907dc5742d2976e61b511769d6b0434274a" alt="Senior Caster Badge"
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of Adder"
Posts: 78
If you want to build a tank that's "I win" vs. other tanks, get the SU-85 instead.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of GGTeMpLaR"
Posts: 4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f349f/f349fdaa4476aad51984fe256ae2394e39f1a884" alt="avatar of TychoCelchuuu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f5d4/4f5d4907dc5742d2976e61b511769d6b0434274a" alt="Senior Caster Badge"
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e602/3e6020d0236a750b49fd20404b2e2f84b08218d6" alt="avatar of UGBEAR"
Posts: 954
here, I've posted something similar and some proposal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51fb6/51fb653aea1eda24af290926799c2e7625952072" alt="avatar of Qvazar"
Posts: 881
http://operationbarbarossa.net/Myth-Busters/MythBusters2.html
Despite all possible factors being in their favour and despite massive German operational losses during 1944, the Soviets still managed to loose around three AFVs for every German AFV destroyed, or around four tanks (mostly T-34/85s) for every German tank destroyed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of GGTeMpLaR"
Posts: 4
Luckily this is a video game and not a history lesson.
It's actually both.
T-34 myth-busting:
http://operationbarbarossa.net/Myth-Busters/MythBusters2.html
That's all true but the stats on paper showed T-34 as superior to the Panzer IV. The only explanation for why the Soviets lost so many T-34s to every Panzer IV is that the Germans used their tanks better at the tactical level (radios would have been influential early in the war but later on the radio usage was more balanced).
I'm not necessarily asking for 100% historical accuracy because that would require an absurd amount of work and overhauling of mechanics and the game works just fine just the way it is. I'm not even asking the T-34 be made stronger than the Panzer IV, just that the gap be made a little closer than it currently is (so apologies for the misleading thread title as it's not exactly what I'm asking). The T-34 just feels weak in general, and saying you need 2 of them, one for ramming, for every Panzer IV would make more sense if the costs were more reflective of that. As it stands though, you can't even make 4 T-34's for every 3 Panzer IV's (and I'm pretty sure even if you could, the 3 Panzer IV's would come out on top against the 4 T-34's).
I just think the T-34 should be slightly buffed because it feels really weak right now and not even worth getting as the Panzer IV is just completely out of its league. This is just made all the more ironic considering from a stats perspective, the T-34 was historically superior in almost every way.
I'm not 100% sure really I'm just asking if anyone else thinks the T-34 feels pretty weak atm and makes T3 in general for Soviets the worst tier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e7a9/5e7a9d6187c4bd7b311370f274f6d309a0eddae8" alt="avatar of BartonPL"
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e602/3e6020d0236a750b49fd20404b2e2f84b08218d6" alt="avatar of UGBEAR"
Posts: 954
1944, T-34/85 comes.....
T-34 has flaw, but if you can find me a better tank in WWII, I DARE YOU
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of theblitz6794"
Posts: 395
Anyways, the t34 is like the CoH 1 sherman. Great for anti infantry...not great for much else.
I typically build 2 anyway though. I find them quite useful for support
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of simonp2"
Posts: 94
I'd like them to do a bit better shooting at rear armor though, I think the game could reward positioning a little more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of von_manstein1939"
Posts: 29
For example:
-Poor quality of metals used in its armor.
-Vastly inferior optics for the main gun.
-No radio communications
-3 man crew size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of CombatMuffin"
Posts: 642
T34 caught Germans by surprise with ONE real feature: sloped armor. After that, for every technological superiority the Russians brought to the tank war, the Germans had a superior one to raise, except the IS-3 that doesn't count.
Paper statistics means nothing in war. The soldier makes the rifle useful, not the other way around.
Game:
We cant keep using units how we expect them to be. The T34 has a very good role if you bring it soon enough, but I agree it needs a tiny boost in some areas (perhaps a slightly lower fuel cost).
That's the problem with an "authentic" RTS set in a historical period. Everyone starts saying the unit in real life had different this and that. That's like saying Queens in history did not murder every other piece in the battlefield, but they do in Chess. Its. A. Game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of theblitz6794"
Posts: 395
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of Trashkitty"
Posts: 11
The T34 doesn't help you come from behind at all. That's what the SU-85 does.
Personally, I'd love to see the SU-85/T70/Scout Car/Maxim balanced out more. I feel like the risk vs reward with those units is very bad. If those units were more balanced I feel like less used units like the T34 could be buffed into being more versatile.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3acf/b3acff84a83f62d03d5dc5376da9456efcdfa3d8" alt="avatar of Dzuari"
Posts: 26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/740d8/740d87ba8120e5e1ce33558878bda408b88020ba" alt="down"
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
96 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
55 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
23 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
14 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
14 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
14 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.42463.871+2
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.300162.649+1
- 4.286110.722-2
- 5.12644.741-1
- 6.312114.732+8
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.1171650.643+2
- 9.725443.621-2
- 10.9233.736+1
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d738/3d738ba3f5cbd3e24af3fddd95429502d7a0163b" alt="Einhoven Country"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cf91/2cf917011d9d9607b84ac08bc7562aac062e928d" alt="Honor"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/849b7/849b77b3ed9ec5ffc38a14de23d1e7f729b5f6f9" alt="Download"
Board Info
2 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, 123b channel
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM