Sherman Bulldozer - making terrain cover bug?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

So I notcied that infantry can't simply hide behind structures made by Bulldozer.
They try to use it not behind it, but on the edges which leads to lack of true cover (I tested it. Guard behind proper cover vs Ober behind this side cover (they have green mark but they obviosuly stay out of cover) and opoosite, Obers behind proper cover and Guard with this side cover. Guard were melted when used "side cover" and they were quite equal behind proper cover so it counts).

Units can't simply stay behind it and use it like a cover, they dance around edges and no matter what, they don't want to hide straight behind.

Posts: 125

fix pls

Posts: 830

And just when you thought the bulldozer Sherman couldn't get more useless than it currently is

Posts: 760

the sherman bulldozer? whats that, oh another useless unit that some guy is on to come on this thread and try to convince people how its a useful and balanced unit.

Posts: 1355

Its not that bad guys. But the point is to fix this, not if its good or bad.

Posts: 587

Ahhh the Sherman Bulldozer, that has less hp and armor than a Brummbar, but has less damage drop off than Brummbar, so its actually better VS infantry, but Brummbar can penetrate tanks, while Sherman bulldozer has only 35 penetration and cant stun vehicles...but its cheaper than a brummbar

Posts: 258

I thought this obstacle is meant to limit tank movement, like tanktraps, If I'm correct tanks can not crush it.

If its intended to be used as a cover, then its obviously broken

Posts: 2561

24 Dec 2015, 16:42 PMShell_yeah

I thought this obstacle is meant to limit tank movement, like tanktraps, If I'm correct tanks can not crush it.

If its intended to be used as a cover, then its obviously broken

It's supposed to do both.