Why can USF inf pickup dual upgrades?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 47

20 Dec 2015, 18:52 PMsorryWTFisthis

I would love to send obers back to Berlin if they could pickup a seond 34 and then get back into the game.

Best comment ever!

Playercard of SKYHAMMER

1v1: P	2v2: None	3v3: None	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

Multi Quote

Posts: 466

While we at it. why dont we make all factions tech nades & weapons.
not just allies. then we can speak about taking away double weapons.

PS. double 1919s are abit retarded

1. Relic bans, not me. 2. It stands in the rules: If you are banned more often, the duration increase and can lead in the end to permaban 3. The Case is bigger as you guys think. So pls step 1 step away pls. 4. I am not a player in the 4vs4 cup, because of RL work.

Multi Quote

Posts: 322

A single one is also way too good, as soon as vet bonuses are applied.

Posts: 468

15 Jan 2016, 13:21 PMsorryWTFisthis

A single one is also way too good, as soon as vet bonuses are applied.

Sure, how about you scale down the lmg34 to the same damage as 1 m1919. Oh, how about letting it shoot on the move too?

15 Jan 2016, 12:06 PMDAZ187

While we at it. why dont we make all factions tech nades & weapons.
not just allies. then we can speak about taking away double weapons.

PS. double 1919s are abit retarded

Yeah, I'm sure Axis would cry for their rifle nades, incendiary nades and what not costing anything as a side upgrade.

Turn double zookas into an identical panzershrek. I'm down for that. lol, not gonna' happen.