
Just,

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1930
Posts: 320
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 121
Posts: 320
I've replaced the entire front page change log with v.25 for all compiled changes to make it easier to track changes.
I will post smaller updates if they pertain to balance. I will generally keep bug-fixes to a minimum unless it's something major that I have not already fixed and mentioned aka Stun Grenades.
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 444
Posts: 1930
Cromwell
File is linked to the Comet and 80 range is still far too much for this ability. Still can smoke off ATGs with only a minor chance of return fire when sighted beforehand. Increased the Cromwell's target size. Previously it was too small matching armoured cars in terms of target size which made it incredibly difficult to hit with other medium tanks. It is still the smallest medium tank, but will be easier for other AT weapon to engage.
-Target size from 18 to 20
-Smoke Range from 80 to 60.
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
yes, the cromwell is small, it's also one of the the biggest reason the cromwells are viable in a game where the axis anti tank weapon penetration cut through allied armor.
If you want to nerf the cromwell, nerf its rotation rate. Its high rotational rate of 38 is what allow it to crush infantry so easily. From my personal testing, Lowering the cromwell's rotation rate to 32 will its remove itslawn mower capability while still allow it to out maneuver axis tanks.
that smoke ability is also one of the few smoke ability for the british. Yes, a sighted cromwell can smoke the atg with impunity, but that's called combined arms. (comet's WP smoke is another mater). Unless the british get some sort of mobile smoke, the cromwell's smoke need to remain at 80.
Posts: 1930
Any actual dedicated or semi-dedicated anti-tank will cut through most mediums without question, however. 18 target size is ridiculous, when you consider that's the same size as the larger scout cars. A target size of 20 will still make it the hardest medium tank to hit in the game. Furthermore, the Cromwell sits at a modest cost for what you get in the package. A good gun, fast speed and good mobility, TC upgrade, and very strong offensive veterancy. Having even just the most average target size at 20 isn't going make the Cromwell bad.
PIV: 22
Sherman: 23
T-34: 22
Cromwell: 18
Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
For the M4A3E8 Sherman "Now has moving scatter penalty. Previously it was missing for some reason."
Isn't this supposed to represent the advancements added to the Easy Eight to allow it to traverse its turret effectively on the move?
Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3
Your standard Shermans already have that at 1.5 as those tanks are already considered as to having stabilizers. Have absolutely no scatter penalty is a little much on the E8.
Posts: 320
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 721
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
51 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
549 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 |