Login

russian armor

WFA Post patch tweaks

15 Dec 2015, 20:04 PM
#21
avatar of nodickwilliams

Posts: 230

Permanently Banned
So what is okws defense against vehicles? Go t2 or fucking die? Racketen is fine in t0. Bad change. Dont agree with obers being 340 mp or t2 infantry. Scotts coming at 6 minute mark would be broken. Scotts can't handle getting rushed down by panther late game with no jackson support. With nothing to threaten them early-mid game they will simply be untouchable firing high explosive death from range. Surely you can't say I'd have to rush down scotts with racketenwerfers firing from 60 range. Not with non doc smoke I can't.

Leave scott ass is, and buff health to 360-400.
15 Dec 2015, 20:07 PM
#22
avatar of Remo

Posts: 111

So what is okws defense against vehicles? Go t2 or fucking die? Racketen is fine in t0. Bad change. Dont agree with obers being 340 mp or t2 infantry. Scotts coming at 6 minute mark would be broken. Scotts can't handle getting rushed down by panther late game with no jackson support. With nothing to threaten them early-mid game they will simply be untouchable firing high explosive death from range. Surely you can't say I'd have to rush down scotts with racketenwerfers firing from 60 range. Not with non doc smoke I can't.

Leave scott ass is, and buff health to 360-400.


Like I said, give volks panzerfausts, then you can use that in conjunction with raketen. Don't see the big deal, other factions have been doing this forever. I would rather see OKW suffer a little if it means the entire game becomes better, because volk spam is fucking horrid.
15 Dec 2015, 20:12 PM
#23
avatar of nodickwilliams

Posts: 230

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post15 Dec 2015, 20:07 PMRemo


Like I said, give volks panzerfausts, then you can use that in conjunction with raketen. Don't see the big deal, other factions have been doing this forever. I would rather see OKW suffer a little if it means the entire game becomes better, because volk spam is fucking horrid.

Just made a suggestion to fix that in your thread.
15 Dec 2015, 20:16 PM
#24
avatar of Remo

Posts: 111


Just made a suggestion to fix that in your thread.


Yea well played, I agree.
15 Dec 2015, 20:58 PM
#25
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322

Go t2 or fucking die?
Go T2 or T3, otherwise just fucking die:lol: Teching is a thing you know.


And I prefer to face the scott rather than the anti everything KoenigsStuart;
15 Dec 2015, 21:04 PM
#26
avatar of nodickwilliams

Posts: 230

Permanently Banned
Atleast paks are more reliable than slow ass low velocity racketens. Atleast grens have fausts. While ostheer infantry are as fragile as a house of cards. With good placement they can be used well. But with okw, with no suppression and low range AT. They wouldn't survive.
17 Dec 2015, 19:25 PM
#27
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Go T2 or T3, otherwise just fucking die:lol: Teching is a thing you know.


And I prefer to face the scott rather than the anti everything KoenigsStuart;





Pls stop using bad language alright ?
17 Dec 2015, 19:29 PM
#28
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322





Pls stop using bad language alright ?
Did you bump a dead thread just to say that?
17 Dec 2015, 20:55 PM
#29
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Did you bump a dead thread just to say that?


Ooh mod sass :sibToxic:
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

842 users are online: 842 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM