Should T-34-85 be non doctrinal?

Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2015, 18:55 PMdOPEnEWhAIRCUT

They should probably scrap the t34/76 all together and just replace it with the 85, priced accordingly to its power. Replace the t34/85 in commanders with an ability for the tank that makes sense. There is never a situation where any decent player thinks to himself "Hey, I could really use a t34/76 right about now".

Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2015, 19:12 PMferwiner

There is if t-34/76 is and early callin that you can get to counter stug e, command panzer, pumas, flak ht, or luchs rush. Its not a bad tank. Its only looks bad when it is placed as the end tank in tech tree as if it was a panther.

Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2015, 19:19 PMdOPEnEWhAIRCUT

Eh maybe, but even then wouldn't you rather just go t3, get a su-76 and keep it supported by AT nade upgraded cons if it meant you got another cool ability for your t34/85? I mean don't get me wrong, tank capping and ramming are kinda cool , but something just a little bit cooler than that? I mean... really really cool.

And yea, it looks really bad in t4.

Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2015, 19:06 PMAchtAchter

Yes, 60 range, high pen, self spotting. You won't destroy reliably heavy tanks or tank destroyers by using t34/85

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 21:58 PMBlackart

Soviets have only obsolete T-34-76 (worst tank in the game) and mediocrate SU-85.

Using non stop same 3-4 commanders with late call-in is getting boring.

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 22:06 PMAustralian Magic

T34/85 as non-doctrinal (all factions have at least one non-doc late game vehicle, except Soviets).
T34/76 as double call-in for 450MP 150F.

Done.

Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 01:55 AMhannibalbarcajr

I like idea of changing 34/85 to dual 34/76 call in but that price would mean each tank only costs 225 MP and 75 fuel which IMO is way too strong even for such a weak tank.