Why no MG Upgrade for the Pershing?
6 Nov 2015, 02:43 AM
#1
Posts: 372
Not a complaint, just wondering as to the reasoning behind it considering even the expensive US .50 cal pintle mounted MG's don't do much.
6 Nov 2015, 03:21 AM
#2
1
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
USF is overpowered enough already.
6 Nov 2015, 03:22 AM
#3
4
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
The idea I believe is that the pershing has good enough AI with its main cannon, and that the vet 2 ability makes use of the hatch to throw grenades.
6 Nov 2015, 05:31 AM
#4
Posts: 4928
Because the Pershing didn't have a turret MG. The closest it had was a rear-mounted M2, but this required the TC to stand on the engine bay to use. Obviously the turret can not turn while this MG is being used.
6 Nov 2015, 05:33 AM
#5
Posts: 1124
its main cannon AI is perfect as is....
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
44 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.618222.736+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
745 users are online:
745 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49140
Welcome our newest member, Drummer
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Drummer
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM