Posts: 707
Grens need a 5th man.
Solved.
Oh yeah and OKW needs a complete overhaul.
Posts: 1705
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1653
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
It's just that allied units got buffed without the axis parts getting some buffs or better called adjustments. Now you get roflstomped by almost every infantry group.
Posts: 959
It's speed and ability to easily crush infantry units extends it's utility being capable dealing with infantry just as good as medium tanks. Whenever I use this unit I accumulate a lot of infantry kills. It's not comparable with real tank destroyers like Jp4 and Su85,since those can not deal with infantry. If use the m10 merely as a tank destroyer and not additionally as a excellent counter harassing unit you do something severely wrong.
Without that crush feature I would agree with both of you.
Posts: 1653
It's the verry reason for wich I stopped playing Ostheer and now, as Axis, I'm exclusively playing OKW and choosing solely between the 2 doctrines that give me at least that so necessary Mg34.
This did COH2 balance right now. Force me to play with 2 doctrines while Axis.
4 Posts: 474
Posts: 721
The funny part about OKW is that the stock infantry, obers. Perform marginally worse for their cost compared to doctrine callin units like jaeger light infantry or even fallshimjagers.
Plus, falls come with mg34s...
4 Posts: 474
wmms falls are pretty weak and they come with fg42...obers are just plain terrible okw imo just need a complete overhaul and the xpensive specialist should perform much much much much much better
including heavies like kt and jadg
Posts: 1653
wmms falls are pretty weak and they come with fg42...obers are just plain terrible okw imo just need a complete overhaul and the xpensive specialist should perform much much much much much better
including heavies like kt and jadg
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
It's the verry reason for wich I stopped playing Ostheer and now, as Axis, I'm exclusively playing OKW and choosing solely between the 2 doctrines that give me at least that so necessary Mg34.
This did COH2 balance right now. Force me to play with 2 doctrines while Axis.
4 Posts: 474
I personally think that mainly the infantry section needs an overhaul, since most of the tanks are good for the cost you pay for them. Perhaps some need some minor buffs, like Pz4 penetration buff. But armour is in my opinion fine. Infantry and them for the volks and missing the MG34 is terrible since you can't do shit and have to get a doctorine with it.
Posts: 721
I have myself little experience with Ostheer but I remember what I read here, "don't try to close the range, keep them in cover mid range and they'll do wonder..." so I did and so they did.
I have every reason to call YOU a noob/scrub when I obviously play much better than you
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
You might be on to something there. I think I will stop listening to all those who say "hey no need to keep this unit in cover, just rush full speed ahead"
Posts: 271
 | Playercard of Raider_Judo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1484
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 128
Okay Axis stop crying. Relic did a phenomenal job in their "attempt" to balance large team games. The addition of Brits helped bridge the gap between USF and Soviets mid game's. We all know how Axis army had a field day in large game modes before the Brit release.
Posts: 2742
Posts: 1954
Nobody ever cared for that for reasons I mentioned countless times. 3vs3+ are won by the fraction with the bigger playerbase because better elo.
 |
|
|
226 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
