Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
my tiger, my tiger ace and my king tigers can do that too, and in addition they can fight others tanks and targets...is that not fine?
Posts: 345
Your tigers don't leave a DOT on the ground which forces AT to move and lacks the accuracy to hit and wipe AT guns quickly.
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
Then, why do you want to reduce the HP croc instead of removing that DOT????? is not leaving the KV8 that DOT too???
what are the benefits to have That DOT in game?? just asking....just trying to undertand it.
Posts: 345
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
Posts: 63
The abandon mechanic adds a small bit of RNG to the game. Whether you're in favor of this or not basically depends on how okay you are with RNG being a factor in the game. The mechanic might be better if it were made more consistent, but I don't think it's a bad mechanic strictly speaking. Taking over abandoned enemy vehicles was done in the actual war and adds a cool flavor element to the game.
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Exactly. And if you want to be a anti-RNG fundamentalist, then where does it end? Shells that always penetrate, or never? War is hell, and chaotic. This is not Starcraft.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 63
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Cannot compare with AI rng planecrashes.
If you think ultrarare abandoned vehicle cost you the game, then remember it will be the unlikely, but possible result of overextended tank movement without any support. Ie bad play.
Posts: 1164
Exactly. And if you want to be a anti-RNG fundamentalist, then where does it end? Shells that always penetrate, or never? War is hell, and chaotic. This is not Starcraft.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Cannot compare with AI rng planecrashes.
If you think ultrarare abandoned vehicle cost you the game, then remember it will be the unlikely, but possible result of overextended tank movement without any support. Ie bad play.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Exactly. And if you want to be a anti-RNG fundamentalist, then where does it end? Shells that always penetrate, or never? War is hell, and chaotic. This is not Starcraft.
Posts: 503
RNG is fine as long as:
1.It's risk vs reward.
2.You have control over it.
In most cases (like tank accuracy, penetration, etc) those two points are provided. You can consider the risks and hope for the best. But things like plane crashes and Abandoned vehicles are different. If there was a mechanic for manipulating Abandon mechanic, you could say it's fine. But it's totally random and has a huge impact. Plane crashes also punish you for using AA vehicles. So RNG is OK and is a signature of CoH series, but the amount and impacts are also important.
Posts: 1026
I go back and forth on the mechanic but one thing I like is it adds something in the back of your mind when you are pushing hard on a flank and your health is getting low. Do I push and finish off this retreating squad/tank and risk that I get abandoned next to my enemy base with no infantry around to recrew? Or do I pull back. The main thing is it does need critical damage to prevent grand theft tank and driving off with a perfectly fine engine. Also, I hate when a tank gets abandoned, recrewed and then shot right away and abandoned again. Sometimes 2x in a row. A recrewed vehicle:tank that gets hit without any repairs should be done.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Snip
Snip
Posts: 269
Posts: 2819
This game just has a shit ton of game design flaws from its launch days. The developers focused more on adding new stuff just to add new stuff without any consideration whether it actually made the game interactive and fun. Deep Snow, the squishing of the UI into something entirely inferior to COH1, all the squad wipes EVEN IN HEAVY cover, the abandoned units, squad members having to wait for their squad leaders to move before moving themselves.
All of it sucks donkey balls and is deeply noninteractive and devalues skill. Some RNG is ok. COH 1 had this in a varying amoutn but not as bad as COH2.
Fundamentally they put in adding stuff just to be different without actually justifying whether it would be fun or improve the game in a meaningful way which is why the had to revert deep snow and decrease the rng. Even in its current state its too much.
+1
 |
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
102 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
