I kinda agree it needs a cost. They gain better armor than shocks and a free lmg in exchange for lower speed. Its effectively an lmg squad with better armor than shocks, and at vet 3, ludicrously low reinforce costs. You can add in 2 more lmgs too. And it can lay mines, detect mines and double speed-repair vehicles too.
(I'd add build emplacements, but poor emplacements have been dead a long while cause of flame dmg bug)
Heavy Royal Engineering upgrade
21 Oct 2015, 13:08 PM
#41
Posts: 509
21 Oct 2015, 13:23 PM
#42
Posts: 473
Permanently BannedAs soon as ranger spam with pershing drops, you will all forget how unfair heavy engineers are. Don't worry, won't be long now!
21 Oct 2015, 13:37 PM
#43
Posts: 170
All the salty axis players in this thread lol
On topic: yeah, it should cost muni. People who say it already has a cost are strangely similar to certain other people who say Axis grenades and weapon upgrades are not free because you need to tech ot get them. You are mostly paying the cost for the uber-OP lategame tanks that Anvil and Hammer offer, and other things are just bonuses.
On topic: yeah, it should cost muni. People who say it already has a cost are strangely similar to certain other people who say Axis grenades and weapon upgrades are not free because you need to tech ot get them. You are mostly paying the cost for the uber-OP lategame tanks that Anvil and Hammer offer, and other things are just bonuses.
21 Oct 2015, 15:43 PM
#44
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
As soon as ranger spam with pershing drops, you will all forget how unfair heavy engineers are. Don't worry, won't be long now!
Until someones shows up on how to abuse it on automatch (reminder of people complaining about M10 and RE spam)
21 Oct 2015, 19:50 PM
#45
Posts: 473
Permanently Banned
Until someones shows up on how to abuse it on automatch (reminder of people complaining about M10 and RE spam)
Haha spot on brother!
22 Oct 2015, 19:23 PM
#46
Posts: 503
Looks balanced to me.
I mean in terms of what he is spending on a Churchill it should be able to kill 3 Panzer IV's in a 3 on 1 situation. Otherwise what is the point of building a Churchill? If it dies he won't be able to get 2 -4, and then the British would be in danger of having no chance at a lategame win. Plus it's not like he has any decent alternate AT options that would justify nerfing the Churchill, the 6 pounder and firefly both suffer from lack of penetration and basically suck.
On top of that economically Germans are already OP in the mid and late game due to *ultra cheap* teching costs, so British need the Churchill to have more health than a Kingtiger for incrementally more fuel than the cost of a single Panzer IV in order to compete.
I don't know why people bother posting these ludicrous examples of balance working as intended.
Please be an example of Poe's Law. Please be an example of Poe's Law. Please be an example of Poe's Law.
23 Oct 2015, 13:01 PM
#47
Posts: 47
I wouldn't mind there being a small cost to them.
However I think there are bigger balance issues with the Brits at the moment (looking at you emplacements).
However I think there are bigger balance issues with the Brits at the moment (looking at you emplacements).
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
55 | |||||
7 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
978 users are online:
978 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50016
Welcome our newest member, GiovannidfRoach
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, GiovannidfRoach
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM