Pershing

Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 19:35 PMvasa1719

Ahaha Lelic, in stream thay say no pershing, but after 6 mounth add him in game, what a genius MVGame.
More balance coming, more, bettre add new OP stuff than fix old pudding.

Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 20:37 PMaaa

They didnt even bother to make a pic of pershing. They copied it from is2 pic.

Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 21:15 PMcomm_ash

Ugh. Why couldn't we just have a jumbo, and we did rangers have to be in the same commander?

Makes me sad to see such an shock rifle esque doctrine.

Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 21:17 PMCookiezNcreem

Are you serious.

Get out of my thread. Icant believe you would even say that in public.

I also cant believe I EVER played 2v2 double usf with you. Have you forgotten the many painful losses we've had.

SNAP OUT OF IT.

Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 22:35 PMLuGer33

The Rifle mines just make it such a ridiculous commander. I hate not really having mines whenever I use anything but Infantry Company and now I can get mines and Rangers AND a Pershing AND a smoke screen for attacks / retreats with one doctrine. Lol.

USF's non-doctrinal early and mid-game is still obviously strong but the faction always faltered as things went late. Although better now, Rifles still don't scale as well into the late game as other infantry and of course all USF tanks require incredible micro to use correctly and keep alive, with one mistake or pathing issue usually meaning death against a competent opponent.

Pershing Company allows USF to play through early and mid as usual (but stronger with mines and field defenses) and then excel in the late game with elite infantry and a heavy tank.

Lawd.