Login

russian armor

Pershing

PAGES (9)down
14 Oct 2015, 19:02 PM
#21
avatar of ThePhalanx
Donator 33

Posts: 33

USF:#KNOW #KNOW #KNOW #KNOW

Axis: #NO #NO #NO #NO #NO
14 Oct 2015, 19:08 PM
#22
avatar of IGOR

Posts: 228

RELIIIC <444>333333 I CANT BELIVEEE <444>3333333
14 Oct 2015, 19:35 PM
#23
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

14 Oct 2015, 19:35 PM
#24
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
Ahaha Lelic, in stream thay say no pershing, but after 6 mounth add him in game, what a genius MVGame.
More balance coming, more, bettre add new OP stuff than fix old pudding.
14 Oct 2015, 19:52 PM
#25
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Be positive. Devs think this game is not dead when they release new content. And new content means more strategies :)
14 Oct 2015, 19:54 PM
#26
avatar of Ben Affleck

Posts: 25

PERSHING COMMANDER, DONALD TRUMP 2016. LETS MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! #BUILDWALL
14 Oct 2015, 19:56 PM
#27
avatar of m00nch1ld
Donator 11

Posts: 641 | Subs: 1

Ahaha Lelic, in stream thay say no pershing, but after 6 mounth add him in game, what a genius MVGame.
More balance coming, more, bettre add new OP stuff than fix old pudding.

ffs you guys whined for months how usf lacks heavy tank and now youre getting it and youre not satisfied :loco:
aaa
14 Oct 2015, 20:37 PM
#28
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487

It looks like one must be very bad in terms of thinking to take seriously that crap.
They didnt even bother to make a pic of pershing. They copied it from is2 pic.
This guy also posted usf sniper pics and sturms with scarf etc.
14 Oct 2015, 20:49 PM
#29
avatar of Zupadupadude

Posts: 618

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 20:37 PMaaa

They didnt even bother to make a pic of pershing. They copied it from is2 pic.



Um

No they didn't
14 Oct 2015, 21:15 PM
#30
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

Ugh. Why couldn't we just have a jumbo, and we did rangers have to be in the same commander?

Makes me sad to see such an shock rifle esque doctrine.
14 Oct 2015, 21:17 PM
#31
avatar of Looney
Patrion 14

Posts: 444

WE DID IT BOYS #believe #knowusfop

:sibDZ::sibHyena:
14 Oct 2015, 21:17 PM
#32
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

Ugh. Why couldn't we just have a jumbo, and we did rangers have to be in the same commander?

Makes me sad to see such an shock rifle esque doctrine.




Are you serious.

Get out of my thread. Icant believe you would even say that in public.

I also cant believe I EVER played 2v2 double usf with you. Have you forgotten the many painful losses we've had.

SNAP OUT OF IT.
14 Oct 2015, 21:19 PM
#33
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1





Are you serious.

Get out of my thread. Icant believe you would even say that in public.

I also cant believe I EVER played 2v2 double usf with you. Have you forgotten the many painful losses we've had.

SNAP OUT OF IT.


:romeoMug:
14 Oct 2015, 21:24 PM
#34
avatar of spajn
Donator 11

Posts: 927

now i want flak 88 lelic pls
14 Oct 2015, 21:43 PM
#35
avatar of Kisiel
Benefactor 115

Posts: 90

Godspeed you magnificent bastards o7
14 Oct 2015, 22:18 PM
#36
14 Oct 2015, 22:25 PM
#37
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

Cookiez, comm, get a room you two
14 Oct 2015, 22:31 PM
#38
avatar of gnaggnoyil

Posts: 65

Ranger spam into Jackson spam with Pershing leading ahead can't wait:bananadance:
14 Oct 2015, 22:35 PM
#39
avatar of LuGer33

Posts: 174

The Rifle mines just make it such a ridiculous commander. I hate not really having mines whenever I use anything but Infantry Company and now I can get mines and Rangers AND a Pershing AND a smoke screen for attacks / retreats with one doctrine. Lol.

USF's non-doctrinal early and mid-game is still obviously strong but the faction always faltered as things went late. Although better now, Rifles still don't scale as well into the late game as other infantry and of course all USF tanks require incredible micro to use correctly and keep alive, with one mistake or pathing issue usually meaning death against a competent opponent.

Pershing Company allows USF to play through early and mid as usual (but stronger with mines and field defenses) and then excel in the late game with elite infantry and a heavy tank.

Lawd.
14 Oct 2015, 22:37 PM
#40
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Oct 2015, 22:35 PMLuGer33
The Rifle mines just make it such a ridiculous commander. I hate not really having mines whenever I use anything but Infantry Company and now I can get mines and Rangers AND a Pershing AND a smoke screen for attacks / retreats with one doctrine. Lol.

USF's non-doctrinal early and mid-game is still obviously strong but the faction always faltered as things went late. Although better now, Rifles still don't scale as well into the late game as other infantry and of course all USF tanks require incredible micro to use correctly and keep alive, with one mistake or pathing issue usually meaning death against a competent opponent.

Pershing Company allows USF to play through early and mid as usual (but stronger with mines and field defenses) and then excel in the late game with elite infantry and a heavy tank.

Lawd.


This thread is for USF FANBOY CIRCLE JERKING ONLY. If youre here to #QQ about pershing make ANOTHER thread and be NEGATIVE there.
Let us USF have our time in the sun. :foreveralone:
PAGES (9)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

1028 users are online: 1 member and 1027 guests
Brick Top
1 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50007
Welcome our newest member, Helzer96
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM