17th Sept Patch impressions - post here
18 Sep 2015, 09:39 AM
#61
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
OCF matches will be USF rifle company vs [insert axis faction here]
18 Sep 2015, 09:53 AM
#62
Posts: 1487
Partysans rekting everything early game.
do you mean partisans from surcharge commander?
If so its could be the same as with tank hunter commander, they buffed it then everyone paid the money for it then they nerfed it to uselessness.
OH sniper cloak time was nerfed. Wasnt it?
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
18 Sep 2015, 09:55 AM
#63
2 
Posts: 1108
the 'messed up' stuff is usually a bug rather than an overnerf or buff (like the vickers hmg range bug)
yeah you are right.... my bad! sry
| Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
18 Sep 2015, 10:05 AM
#64
4 Posts: 474
So originally I thought that if you want to abuse the vickers MG bug, you just have to put it in a building, get it vet 1, and then let it decrew and do the whole process again to increase its range.
I was wrong, all you have to do is get vet 1 in a building, exit, and re-enter for more range.
I have a feeling the abuse is coming unless this is hotfixed.
I was wrong, all you have to do is get vet 1 in a building, exit, and re-enter for more range.
I have a feeling the abuse is coming unless this is hotfixed.
18 Sep 2015, 10:17 AM
#65
Posts: 732
Paratroopers with thompsons are officially best infantry unit in game now. With the new squad spreading (un wipeable) and their DPS is just insane now 
18 Sep 2015, 10:28 AM
#66
Posts: 4
Now Axis inf suck as hell and Ost Pz4 is new T-34. Anyone try Tiger with buff?
18 Sep 2015, 10:33 AM
#67
4 Posts: 474
Kay, new bug.
You can destroy OKW trucks with commando glider. As shown here:
You can destroy OKW trucks with commando glider. As shown here:
18 Sep 2015, 10:43 AM
#68
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Kay, new bug.
You can destroy OKW trucks with commando glider. As shown here:
I can paraphrase Alex
If it's fine for OKW base flaks and schwerer to bring down 540MP glider, because they can't afford getting 251/17, it is OK for glider to destroy trucks since Brits don't have any useful artillery excpet doctrinal Sexton
18 Sep 2015, 11:01 AM
#69
Posts: 25
Fuck yeah Partysans.
Time to get revenge.
Time to get revenge.
18 Sep 2015, 11:06 AM
#70
Posts: 270 | Subs: 1
Alright I will be the first person to ever say this but the new partisans are OP. I've been using the for the past few games and they are monsters.
They are too cheap for how effective they are, only 210 manpower. They consistently kill ass grens and sturmpios, and with vet the become monsters. I think the performance may be fine, but they definitely need to be at least 250 manpower.
I noticed this too.
In the balance preview after they removed the ridiculous StGs, the MP-40s felt really weak, but now the PPSHs they have are almost as good as those StGs.
They can camo, plant mines and wire, throw molotovs and regular nades (or AT nades) and will very likely win in a 1on1 when they deploy from a building given that the enemy player may not react as his units looked like they were safe on an empty cap point. (even if he does react, partisans will beat grens EASY if they deploy close enough.)
also this commander has MAPHACKS which are very very useful for only 50 munitions, and mark vehicle can make up for lack of a good tank call-in.
(please don't nerf them though
)
18 Sep 2015, 11:10 AM
#71
4 Posts: 1006
dat Vickers. gg wp 
\
/ \
/
/ \/
18 Sep 2015, 11:19 AM
#72
Posts: 1225
Brit mines oneshot all the time, so I reckon the same applies to OKW and Soviet mines...is that intentional?
Also, as predicted, OH is monumentally crappy...
Also, as predicted, OH is monumentally crappy...
18 Sep 2015, 11:35 AM
#73
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I noticed this too.
In the balance preview after they removed the ridiculous StGs, the MP-40s felt really weak, but now the PPSHs they have are almost as good as those StGs.
They can camo, plant mines and wire, throw molotovs and regular nades (or AT nades) and will very likely win in a 1on1 when they deploy from a building given that the enemy player may not react as his units looked like they were safe on an empty cap point. (even if he does react, partisans will beat grens EASY if they deploy close enough.)
also this commander has MAPHACKS which are very very useful for only 50 munitions, and mark vehicle can make up for lack of a good tank call-in.
(please don't nerf them though
They are actually 2 DPS ahead of IR StG's at close range, so technically they are actually better with their current insane PPSH than they were when they had Sturmpio StG's
18 Sep 2015, 11:50 AM
#74
Posts: 1225
KV-8 back to being batshit op. Flamepools, glorious idea.
18 Sep 2015, 11:52 AM
#75
Posts: 134
whats the point of the m5 and 251 ht vet 3 bonus when they cant reinforce with their upgrades?
we all know thats imposible to get to vet 3 with those units without the upgrades
we all know thats imposible to get to vet 3 with those units without the upgrades
18 Sep 2015, 12:22 PM
#76
Posts: 67
Really looking forward to seeing partisans in the tournament and in general enjoying actually seeing them in the game again. They might be a bit strong at the moment but its nice to actually see them not be useless.
USF are also feeling pretty damn strong, but will wait until I have played with and against them enough to fully get an opinion, same with Axis.
Brits early game though is still weak, the bren is just not reliable vs snipers. I feel like buffs and nerfs are still needed on Brits. They just kind of feel like a magicarp faction in 1v1.
USF are also feeling pretty damn strong, but will wait until I have played with and against them enough to fully get an opinion, same with Axis.
Brits early game though is still weak, the bren is just not reliable vs snipers. I feel like buffs and nerfs are still needed on Brits. They just kind of feel like a magicarp faction in 1v1.
If allies had nukes, they would still be underpowered
18 Sep 2015, 12:38 PM
#77
Posts: 111
18 Sep 2015, 12:47 PM
#78
Posts: 87
brits really suck now no reason to build defences anymore well done relic
18 Sep 2015, 13:07 PM
#79
Posts: 721
omg relic what did you do it was just perfect before the brits came now it all messed up again.
On the patch notes i will say obers,falls,storms,panzergradniers are weeping in a corner and relic should either remove these units from the game or change their because in current performance it is a disgrace to hold these names....relic dont disgrace the elites of ww2 FFS..
On the patch notes i will say obers,falls,storms,panzergradniers are weeping in a corner and relic should either remove these units from the game or change their because in current performance it is a disgrace to hold these names....relic dont disgrace the elites of ww2 FFS..
18 Sep 2015, 13:22 PM
#80
Posts: 91
With the superpowered LEIG and the mortar halftrack on every game there is no reason, not even single reason to do emplacements as brits.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
230 | ||
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231