Panzer 4 Command Tank is Overperforming
Posts: 466 | Subs: 1
Investing exorbitant amounts of resources to defeat this unit, and the extremely efficient support that it surrounds itself with, is frankly unfair given the nature in which this unit is created.
The only suggestion I think would truly solve this issue, since removing the unit all together is a fantasy, is that we apply the same treatment we gave to the E8 Sherman and T-34/85's and move it into T3 so that it requires much more investment to produce.
I know I usually do not involve myself in the balance discussions on this forum, mostly due to their irrational and toxic arguments, but I felt It should be necessary to raise this issue since we are on the verge of the biggest tournament in Coh2 History.
I hope this thread provides for a Civil discussion and that moderators filter out the divisive and unnecessary rhetoric that this sub-thread usually entails.
Thank you !!
Posts: 113
I see no harm in adding in a tech requirement for it, given its current potency.
(On another note, The M4C Sherman should probably get the same treatment. Lend Lease can be played as the new Advanced Warfare, for all its hilarity. Killed a Tiger Ace and a Panther in the same engagement by drowning them in Con AT nades and Call-in Shermans)
Posts: 770
But if you want to put it in tier 3 be my guest.
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
J/K
I agree Momo, but I'm afraid people would rather go for a regular P4 then instead, leaving P4 command tank doctrines in an awkward spot. But I like the idea with some tweaks and adjustmets. Could we do the same to the M4C Sherman from Lend Lease aswell? And the KV8, IS2, ISU, Tiger, ... while we're at it.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
momo4sho allied fanboy omg
J/K
I agree Momo, but I'm afraid people would rather go for a regular P4 then instead, leaving P4 command tank doctrines in an awkward spot. But I like the idea with some tweaks and adjustmets. Could we do the same to the M4C Sherman from Lend Lease aswell? And the KV8, IS2, ISU, Tiger, ... while we're at it.
+1 all call ins should be limited
Posts: 102
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
It beats an M4c 1on1 so yeah a nerf is in order.
that's not the point dude
Posts: 466 | Subs: 1
momo4sho allied fanboy omg
J/K
I agree Momo, but I'm afraid people would rather go for a regular P4 then instead, leaving P4 command tank doctrines in an awkward spot. But I like the idea with some tweaks and adjustmets. Could we do the same to the M4C Sherman from Lend Lease aswell? And the KV8, IS2, ISU, Tiger, ... while we're at it.
I do recognize the issue of keeping it relevant and that putting it into T3 will undoubtedly make players second guess their decisions. I think this is healthy for the game and would involve more tactical thinking and decision making rather than "hue hue call in tank ". Put it up to the Wehrmacht player to decide which unit would satisfy their most immediate concern instead of pigeon holing them into call ins. Do I want a more AT capable unit, or one that boosts my core and can allow me to hold and capture certain points much more efficiently?
That's the type of discourse I would like to initiate for all units that are similar to this one, as the ones you mentioned. I am certainly for the same treatment for these others, but I think they might deserve a case by case analysis rather than grouping them all together.
Posts: 2470
+1 all call ins should be limited
commannd IV has always been capped at one, at least since the original beta.
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
Posts: 466 | Subs: 1
P4 is good vs infantry on ly and vehicles, probably never seen it killing any mediums, it has like 0 chance to penetrate them in front
This is not true and I suggest for you to test it out for yourself if you haven't witnessed it before.
Of course it is not as lethal vs mediums as a regular Panzer 4, but it can get the job done, especially with the support that is almost always with it.
Posts: 102
What is more broken is the M4C sherman.
Posts: 28
Posts: 31
momo4sho allied fanboy omg
J/K
I agree Momo, but I'm afraid people would rather go for a regular P4 then instead, leaving P4 command tank doctrines in an awkward spot. But I like the idea with some tweaks and adjustmets. Could we do the same to the M4C Sherman from Lend Lease aswell? And the KV8, IS2, ISU, Tiger, ... while we're at it.
+1
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29
Posts: 61
momo4sho allied fanboy omg
J/K
I agree Momo, but I'm afraid people would rather go for a regular P4 then instead, leaving P4 command tank doctrines in an awkward spot. But I like the idea with some tweaks and adjustmets. Could we do the same to the M4C Sherman from Lend Lease aswell? And the KV8, IS2, ISU, Tiger, ... while we're at it.
+1
Really wish Relic would reach out to the top players of this game and have them balance it. Their suggestions are fair and not biased. (In most cases )
Posts: 64
This unit, as of recent patches, has propelled itself into the spotlight as an indispensable tool in the Wehrmacht army. This unit, which does not require any preconditions to spawn ( other than command points ), is responsible for so many comebacks and victories because of its inherently broken design and ease of use. Not only can it go toe to toe with nearly any other medium tank in the game that requires teching, but it provides an enormous endurance buff to other core Wehrmacht units, which combined together, provide for an extremely potent strategy that is absurdly hard to break. This applies especially so in 1v1, and more so to USF than Soviets...
Not only can it go toe to toe with nearly any other medium tank
provides an enormous endurance buff
Based on this, i guess you don't even know the tank and the aura stats.
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.
Posts: 73
I find it too durable. Maybe they should change it so the buff it gives doesn't apply to itself?I'm a fan of this approach + limiting it to tier 3 as others have suggested. I mean, I think all call-ins should be tied to buildings, or at least all tanks, but yeah.
Based on this, i guess you don't even know the tank and the aura stats.Oh please. You weren't watching momo's stream the other day. (He won, btw.)
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none.
Posts: 2885
That said it shouldn't be tied to tier 3 as it limits the options given to the player. Maybe it could be tied to battlephase 2 in order to make it cheaper than p4, but not cheap ass option.
The choice wheather the doctrine should get command p4 or short barrel p4 should be made by relic as they know all the usage data for those commander but I would personally change Mobile Defence, Festung Armor and Fortified Armor, while leaving Blitzkried and Mechanised as they are right now.
Posts: 692
Livestreams
26 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, kubetstore
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM