Churchill vs Comet
Posts: 11
I myself prefer the Churchill.
It's robust, can take multiple hits and is still reasonably powerfull. It's maybe a little slow but that I can easily forgive.
The comet is not bad but to me at the moment doesn't feel as powerfull as a heavy tank should feel.
Just my cup of tea though.
Thoughts on this?
Posts: 130
Posts: 41
once the nerfs start rolling out the comet might look good again, but right now just go with churchills and the superior crocs/avres
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Posts: 11
Posts: 334
Posts: 90
Churchill , even with 1440 HP will still be pretty Op compared to the 740 HP comet with nerf to scatter. Couple churchill with usefull ability like Airburst shells and combat royal engi. No choices for us
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
1. Less Fuel
2. Perfect shield for Fireflies
3. AI isn't far behind Comet's
4. Airburst Shells makes up for the crappy scatter on 25 Pounders
5. Heavy Engineers help reduce MP Bleed late game
6. Perfect Command Vehicle
Don't get me wrong, I like the Comet but it feels a tad too squishy against Axis AT and with the pending nerfs probably overpriced for it performance. Freaking love the White Phos. shells at Vet 1 though.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
But if you dont have crocie , go anvil of course.
Also if you dont know what crocie does its churchill combined with universal carier flametrhower , all others thinks are copied from churchill normal.
But when nerft start roling left and right , i dont know what i ll go.
Posts: 258
Posts: 1063
Posts: 61
Posts: 1384
Posts: 90
Posts: 2819
Crocodile = GG
Posts: 1653
Posts: 9
Thoughts?
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Livestreams
43 | |||||
31 | |||||
30 | |||||
111 | |||||
30 | |||||
18 | |||||
15 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger