Idk how you are even putting this as debatable. Are people completely denying numbers? Is raw data not enough to convince someone? This is just denial:
OKW Winrates from http://www.coh2.org/ladders/index/2/4/0:
Everyone has around 85% winrate with streaks up to +52
USF Winrates from http://www.coh2.org/ladders/index/3/4/0:
Everyone has around 57% winrate with streaks up to +8
May I repeat that NUMBERS AND STATISTICS show that Axis winrates are staggeringly high and its right in front of your eyes waiting to either be embraced or completely ignored. Not only does http://coh2chart.com/ justify my case, the leaderboards do as well.
And of course, personal experiences. You can check my playercard as well
I never said Axis win rates weren't high in randoms. When you have 2 AT's facing off against each other whoever has the superior team work and coordination will win. This was shown dozens of times were individually good players lost their teams 3v3 and 4v4 games because they lacked the coordination of more dedicated team game players who knew how to fight as a unit.
If you want to make things easier for Allied randoms then you need to increase the player base so it's not a constant parade of top ranked player beating the shit out of low ranked players AND you need to map the maps not unrelenting shit camp fests (as camping is very easy to do at a low skill level and Axis is good at it).
Having played in a competitive tournament that included 3v3 and 4v4 no matter what faction people played with the team that combined good individual skill with planning and team work won regardless of being Allies or Axis. Yes USF is worse in team games outside of abusing gimmicks and similarly OKW is undesirable when compared to Ostheer because it's lot easier to counter OKW (Point and click with Katyusha's or Priests) with strats you know the enemy can't actually DO anything about.