No one playing Wehr anymore?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 88

20 Aug 2015, 11:17 AMElSlayer

Making statement about whole playerbase among all formats and ladder ranks based on 6 games?

Statistics about top 200 players says otherwise: http://coh2chart.com/

People really need to stop posting that chart as an Indicator for anything as it provides almost no useful data.

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Data is just information, it's depends how you use it.

I wouldn't say 6 games is a good measure but i'll say it's easier for the average player to go OKW against SU than OH against SU. So they'll do that.

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 254

20 Aug 2015, 19:19 PMelchino7

Data is just information, it's depends how you use it.

I wouldn't say 6 games is a good measure but i'll say it's easier for the average player to go OKW against SU than OH against SU. So they'll do that.

Since I am kinda new, can you elaborate why Ostheer has the disadvantage and OKW less so?

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

20 Aug 2015, 20:21 PMQbix

Since I am kinda new, can you elaborate why Ostheer has the disadvantage and OKW less so?

OH: tellers (which most won't use or has limited ammo due to LMG/Medic/Nade) and pak (requires preparation) are your main sources against both T70/Quad/Stuart. PG with shrecks is a bleed trap (early on) and 222 requires micro and some supplementary AT (unless you build 2 and it's way too risky).
You could go Mobile defense and get a Puma, but that locks your options.

OKW: on the other hand, you have "spammable" shrecks/raks. You still have mines and if you go mechanized you have Pumas which basically locks down any T3 play. All of this is way easier to use for the average joe.