Login

russian armor

Performance issues: good pc- no fps

13 Jun 2013, 11:47 AM
#1
avatar of asuszodiac

Posts: 4

Hi guys,
i have very low fps playing coh2 with my rig.
system: i7930@4,2ghz,6gb1667mhzcl7ram,hd7970@1100mhz
I have avg. 45 fps in Benchmark but ingame i only have 25-40 really annoyingn
Sbd else with this problem?
Thanks in advance!
13 Jun 2013, 12:40 PM
#2
avatar of Thrill
Donator 11

Posts: 300

on what settings?
13 Jun 2013, 13:23 PM
#3
avatar of Budwise
Admin Red  Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2

Driver Updates
Windows Updates
Turn off any antivirus that might be scanning all the time
13 Jun 2013, 14:05 PM
#4
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

turn down the Gameplay Resolution, this thing is causing massive lag even in my much better Rig
13 Jun 2013, 14:17 PM
#5
avatar of Budwise
Admin Red  Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2

He shouldnt need to turn down the res in that system...
13 Jun 2013, 14:22 PM
#6
avatar of Marcus2389
Developer Relic Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 4559 | Subs: 2

Try lowering to "LOW" the AntiAliasing quality, from what I could understand higher qualities of AA impact a lot performances.
13 Jun 2013, 14:27 PM
#7
avatar of asuszodiac

Posts: 4

@Porygon: If you have a much better Rig there shouldnt be any lag. But thanks for the advice im gonna try this.
@Budwise: i agree. My rig is good enough for crysis 3 and bf3 but not for coh2...
I´ve already updated windows and catalyst driver. My Antivir is set to gamermode...
I´ve good benchmark-results compared to similar systems so i think the problem is the beta. Thanks and have a nice day :)
13 Jun 2013, 14:34 PM
#8
avatar of asuszodiac

Posts: 4

@Marcus: Off course that´d be a solution for more fps. But with the overclocked, strongest AMD-Single-Gpu shouldn´t be any problem for this game. Crysis 3 and Bf3 have much butter graphics and i get avg. 75(bf3) and 45(c3). I thought there ´d be another solution.
13 Jun 2013, 14:35 PM
#9
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2013, 14:17 PMBudwise
He shouldnt need to turn down the res in that system...


Gameplay Resolution =/= Display Resolution

I don't even know what the fuck is it

CPU: Intel i5-4670K Haswell 3.4GHz OC @ 4.0GHz with Corsair H80i Water Cooling
RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 8GB
MB: Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H
Display: ASUS GTX 670 DirectCU II OC
SSD: Plextor M5Pro 256GB

That's my spec and lag still occur in blizzard
13 Jun 2013, 14:48 PM
#10
avatar of asuszodiac

Posts: 4

Ah Okay. Ty but why is that a much better system o.O
Yor cpu is equal, the gpu is worse :)
A HD 7970@1100 beats the gtx 680 without problems
13 Jun 2013, 14:54 PM
#11
avatar of Zenith

Posts: 10

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2013, 13:23 PMBudwise
Driver Updates
Windows Updates
Turn off any antivirus that might be scanning all the time


Are you kidding me? A better advice couldnt you find than this crap?

He has an high end comp, and you tell him to do windows updates. lol.
13 Jun 2013, 15:11 PM
#12
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Ah Okay. Ty but why is that a much better system o.O
Yor cpu is equal, the gpu is worse :)
A HD 7970@1100 beats the gtx 680 without problems


No shit

Westmere < Sandy Bridge < Ivy Bridge < Haswell
Westmere i7 is quite shitty now

and 7970 is just ~ GTX670

Driver Updates helps
Windows Update is quite a troll

Best solution is getting a Titans or one more 7970 crossfire :crazy:
13 Jun 2013, 15:42 PM
#13
avatar of Budwise
Admin Red  Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2013, 14:54 PMZenith


Are you kidding me? A better advice couldnt you find than this crap?

He has an high end comp, and you tell him to do windows updates. lol.


He has a high end computer hence the hardware is probably not the issue, but instead software. Learn something about computers before lashing out at my free advice. Drivers and updates are #1 on the list of possibilities for causing problems on a machine that otherwise has plenty of horsepower. I run an IT company and do this stuff every day so if you dont like my advice then by all means dont take it.
13 Jun 2013, 15:48 PM
#14
avatar of SuperKeitel

Posts: 158

I got the same problems, i posted same topic on coh official forum, they said it'll be worked on.
13 Jun 2013, 20:00 PM
#15
avatar of Marcus2389
Developer Relic Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 4559 | Subs: 2

The AA used on COH2 is extremely fps killer (@Bud: basically they changed the Gameplay Resolution of 150%-200% to medium/high AA). For those who played The Witcher 2, it remembers me the "Uber sampling" AA, able to kill even an high end VGA xD
13 Jun 2013, 20:21 PM
#16
avatar of Pfuscher

Posts: 183

The benchmarks I've seen so far(pcgames) all say that the AA in coh2 is actually FXAA. (Tell me if they said something wrong.)
Which means Relic has mistaken us for playing coh2 on a 5 year old console, because fxaa blurs the shit out graphics and sacrifices optic for AA.

I once again recommend an SMAA injector, I bet it takes less frames away, looks better and doesn't have those bugs with flames.
Or just wait till we know the antialiasing flags.

Why did they take world resolution higher than 1 away? What did it anyway? Didn't look better

Witcher's ubersampling is completely another technique and a lot better btw.

I know a lot of people from geforce 560ti to 670 with updated drivers, that can't run coh2 properly. Seems like Amd is paying good money. Although they don't get the 4000er series working ^^
14 Jun 2013, 05:19 AM
#17
avatar of GeneralHell
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 1560 | Subs: 1

GTX 660ti working like a charm on COH2 with the highest settings. With the lastest Nvidia drivers that is.
14 Jun 2013, 10:56 AM
#18
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

GTX 660ti working like a charm on COH2 with the highest settings. With the lastest Nvidia drivers that is.


What? My GTX 670 doesn't really agree with you

Maybe my standard of fps acceptance is higher
14 Jun 2013, 11:08 AM
#19
avatar of crazyguy

Posts: 331

The new patch has helped my performance with a 670 a bit though.
14 Jun 2013, 15:14 PM
#20
avatar of jmarks2001

Posts: 187

The benchmarks I've seen so far(pcgames) all say that the AA in coh2 is actually FXAA. (Tell me if they said something wrong.)
Which means Relic has mistaken us for playing coh2 on a 5 year old console, because fxaa blurs the shit out graphics and sacrifices optic for AA.

I once again recommend an SMAA injector, I bet it takes less frames away, looks better and doesn't have those bugs with flames.
Or just wait till we know the antialiasing flags.

Why did they take world resolution higher than 1 away? What did it anyway? Didn't look better

Witcher's ubersampling is completely another technique and a lot better btw.

I know a lot of people from geforce 560ti to 670 with updated drivers, that can't run coh2 properly. Seems like Amd is paying good money. Although they don't get the 4000er series working ^^


About the SMAA injector...does this mean to tell your video card what kind of AA to use and ignore the in-game settings? If so, I tried this using AMD Catalyst Control Center. I selected SMAA and saw no difference in image quality or framerate, so I assume it wasn't really working. Maybe it's because the game doesn't offer a "No AA" option which is what AMD recommends you set your game settings to.

Have you (or anyone for that matter) had any luck with this in COH2? If so, tips would be appreciated.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 39
unknown 29
Germany 948
Russian Federation 232

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

186 users are online: 186 guests
0 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49017
Welcome our newest member, Hinkel
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM