USF - Worst faction in COH History
- This thread is locked
27 Jul 2015, 07:14 AM
#201
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
looks like I'm going to be doing 1v1's tomorrow for practice
27 Jul 2015, 07:15 AM
#202
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Ratchet, Alex, I hope you 2 are done with derailing this thread because mods might just close it if it continues.
Back on topic before I lock it myself.
Back on topic before I lock it myself.
27 Jul 2015, 07:18 AM
#203
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Ratchet, Alex, I hope you 2 are done with derailing this thread because mods might just close it if it continues.
I didn't start it, why you guys keep unbanning kwen is beyond me or anyone else really.
27 Jul 2015, 07:22 AM
#204
Posts: 380
We can talk about USF for long, but it is clear, that this faction need more units, buffs and redisign changes. I hope Jason with relic read this thread and make right changes for usf.
27 Jul 2015, 07:25 AM
#205
Posts: 34
Why not design the faction around documented reality and how the faction was supposed to have played out in the first place?
MOBILITY AND FLEXIBLITY WITH SOME EMPHASIS ON FOCUSED FIRE!!!
Soviets are more about volume and saturation via near endless excretions of metal, blood and fire. The US is more focused and direct in that regard but less about hoards and more about fire and maneuver. Micro is a big part of this faction but blobs will be blobs...
Soviets=Overwhelming and Indirect fire
USF=Focused Fire and Shoot and Scoot
That's just my over generalization however...
I think the Engine couldn't handle that, documented reality was that 1 German Soldier killed 14 Soviets. To Keep things "balanced" Grens Squad= 4ppl and Conscript= 32ppl
And the US only won because the war was already lost for Germany due to the eastern front.
(I don't need to mention UK and France here,they did nothing)
27 Jul 2015, 07:26 AM
#206
Posts: 446 | Subs: 2
Alex vs Queen
I literally cried.
Guys I have the real solution.
So MGs are total shit if they can't suppress single infantry, but too powerful if they don't, right?
No wait but I have the solution.
So add one more guy to the Axis MG squads AND THEN MAKE THEM COST LESS TO REINFORCE
AND THEN MAKE THEM WORSE AT SUPPRESSING SINGLE SQUADS
BUT THEN MAKE IT TAKE LONG ENOUGH TO PIN THAT RIFLES CAN GET CLOSE ENOUGH TO CHUCKANADE
AND ALSO MAKE SUPPRESSION EFFECT DECAY SLOWER
AND THEN MAKE THE NADE CHEAPER
BUT THEN ALSO INCREASE THE DAMAGE / ACCURACY OF THE MG SO THE NADE TOSSES ARE RISKY OR MAKE IT MORE SO DAMAGE / ACCURACY LONGER IS SUPPRESSED ENEMY
Well, I figure that can be boiled down to "make MGs do less suppression, but more damage, yet buffer them from the inevitable grenade threat."
Good positioning should always be rewarded, and bad positioning punished. The supposed issue with the MG42 is that it "completely shuts down rifles", well, I see it differently. Rather, I think that the MG counters too hard, and that nades also counter the MGs too hard, but I want to maintain this very tangible reward and punishment of positiong, HOWEVER, this will also provide the option for the USF / Sov player to bleed and spend muni to get HMGs to retreat.
This is still quite different from the patch before the MG buffs, since blobs would be forced onto the ground for longer while not being pinned, and the MG would likely survive, and the blobs would likely have sustained more damage.
I think it's far better this more soft-counter way. USF would have the (very manpower expensive) option of brute forcing their way through their bad decision to walk into an HMG.
I literally cried.
Guys I have the real solution.
So MGs are total shit if they can't suppress single infantry, but too powerful if they don't, right?
No wait but I have the solution.
So add one more guy to the Axis MG squads AND THEN MAKE THEM COST LESS TO REINFORCE
AND THEN MAKE THEM WORSE AT SUPPRESSING SINGLE SQUADS
BUT THEN MAKE IT TAKE LONG ENOUGH TO PIN THAT RIFLES CAN GET CLOSE ENOUGH TO CHUCKANADE
AND ALSO MAKE SUPPRESSION EFFECT DECAY SLOWER
AND THEN MAKE THE NADE CHEAPER
BUT THEN ALSO INCREASE THE DAMAGE / ACCURACY OF THE MG SO THE NADE TOSSES ARE RISKY OR MAKE IT MORE SO DAMAGE / ACCURACY LONGER IS SUPPRESSED ENEMY
Well, I figure that can be boiled down to "make MGs do less suppression, but more damage, yet buffer them from the inevitable grenade threat."
Good positioning should always be rewarded, and bad positioning punished. The supposed issue with the MG42 is that it "completely shuts down rifles", well, I see it differently. Rather, I think that the MG counters too hard, and that nades also counter the MGs too hard, but I want to maintain this very tangible reward and punishment of positiong, HOWEVER, this will also provide the option for the USF / Sov player to bleed and spend muni to get HMGs to retreat.
This is still quite different from the patch before the MG buffs, since blobs would be forced onto the ground for longer while not being pinned, and the MG would likely survive, and the blobs would likely have sustained more damage.
I think it's far better this more soft-counter way. USF would have the (very manpower expensive) option of brute forcing their way through their bad decision to walk into an HMG.
27 Jul 2015, 07:34 AM
#207
1
Posts: 72
So add one more guy to the Axis MG squads AND THEN MAKE THEM COST LESS TO REINFORCE
AND THEN MAKE THEM WORSE AT SUPPRESSING SINGLE SQUADS
BUT THEN MAKE IT TAKE LONG ENOUGH TO PIN THAT RIFLES CAN GET CLOSE ENOUGH TO CHUCKANADE
AND ALSO MAKE SUPPRESSION EFFECT DECAY SLOWER
AND THEN MAKE THE NADE CHEAPER
BUT THEN ALSO INCREASE THE DAMAGE / ACCURACY OF THE MG SO THE NADE TOSSES ARE RISKY OR MAKE IT MORE SO DAMAGE / ACCURACY LONGER IS SUPPRESSED ENEMY
no
27 Jul 2015, 07:36 AM
#208
Posts: 710
Ok.
So I read through 2nd page (if you have 100 posts per page) and it was all crazy offtopic.
I think this thread here is done. If you wish to continue discussing about USF, create another thread and I'll promise to monitor that thread post by post myself.
So I read through 2nd page (if you have 100 posts per page) and it was all crazy offtopic.
I think this thread here is done. If you wish to continue discussing about USF, create another thread and I'll promise to monitor that thread post by post myself.
27 Jul 2015, 12:21 PM
#209
Posts: 762 | Subs: 4
If anything, Luvnest proved that USF are okay. I had him up to his base territories in the mid game and he came back from it. I was playing Wehrmacht
29 Jul 2015, 22:10 PM
#210
Posts: 762 | Subs: 4
I take it back. Everything. I can't give an opinion on balance.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
31 | |||||
21 | |||||
17 | |||||
1 | |||||
305 | |||||
205 | |||||
5 | |||||
3 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
542 users are online:
542 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM