Login

russian armor

Nice to see the new patch....

10 Jul 2015, 11:15 AM
#21
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978

Enjoy your undisputed Lategame supremacy while it lasts! ;)
You mean the T-34/85 meta? What fucking late game advantage?

How hard is it to understand? I am talking about Firefly and Comet, not a static gun. Why would they make more damage than a Panther? That would lead to stupid situations - especially with the shit rate of fire. Panther had the same performing gun but also better armor. Now it´s supposed to go down vs something with the same gun but less armor?

The M36 has already shown that more than 160 damage on vehicles is shit.

But yeah - that´s the special snow flake at its finest.
10 Jul 2015, 11:26 AM
#22
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

You mean the T-34/85 meta? What fucking late game advantage?

How hard is it to understand? I am talking about Firefly and Comet, not a static gun. Why would they make more damage than a Panther? That would lead to stupid situations - especially with the shit rate of fire. Panther had the same performing gun but also better armor. Now it´s supposed to go down vs something with the same gun but less armor?

The M36 has already shown that more than 160 damage on vehicles is shit.

But yeah - that´s the special snow flake at its finest.


You don't know anything yet in terms of unit stats, unit roles, or unit price. Why would you assume that said units would be able to do so?

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

(Bonus lol at OP Jackson, I'm sure you would love a 160 dmg Jackson with a higher ROF to compensate)
10 Jul 2015, 11:33 AM
#23
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978



You don't know anything yet in terms of unit stats, unit roles, or unit price. Why would you assume that said units would be able to do so?

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

(Bonus lol at OP Jackson, I'm sure you would love a 160 dmg Jackson with a higher ROF to compensate)
I´m not going to break the NDA, though I didn´t even sign it. But I played some games in the Alpha at a friends place. And let me tell you there´s some weird stuff going on.
10 Jul 2015, 11:34 AM
#24
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


The M36 has already shown that more than 160 damage on vehicles is shit.

But yeah - that´s the special snow flake at its finest.

Like elephant or jagdtiger?

The special snowflake like that exists since alpha and can two shot most medium armor.
10 Jul 2015, 11:35 AM
#25
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

Gun caliber does not directly relate to anti-tank ability people, jesus christ

10 Jul 2015, 11:42 AM
#26
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

I´m not going to break the NDA, though I didn´t even sign it. But I played some games in the Alpha at a friends place. And let me tell you there´s some weird stuff going on.


Quirks in a 2 month old (already) alpha that had more balance issues than a drunk trombonist? Really?

Just wait until we see the actual balance, then you can complain all you want. The whole point of the alpha was mainly bug fixes and design ideas, not balance.
10 Jul 2015, 11:43 AM
#27
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jul 2015, 11:34 AMKatitof

Like elephant or jagdtiger?

The special snowflake like that exists since alpha and can two shot most medium armor.
You mean the doctrinal 245 fuel vehicle without a turret that can barely move or turn?

If you want to compare damage output take Panther and Jackson.
10 Jul 2015, 12:09 PM
#28
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

You mean the doctrinal 245 fuel vehicle without a turret that can barely move or turn?

If you want to compare damage output take Panther and Jackson.


That is irrelevant really.

They are there, you can't ignore them, just because they go against your argument.
But if it makes you feel better, you can still compare damage and calibers to what IS-2, KV-2 or ISU got to see that your logic is bullshit.

@alex
yes, because we're on ww2 historical discussion thread and not on arcade RTS games forum... :snfBarton:
10 Jul 2015, 12:10 PM
#29
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jul 2015, 12:09 PMKatitof


That is irrelevant really.

They are there, you can't ignore them, just because they go against your argument.

@alex
yes, because we're on ww2 historical discussion thread and not on arcade RTS games forum... :snfBarton:


In game caliber doesn't translate directly into anti tank ability either so.....
10 Jul 2015, 12:18 PM
#30
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

Gun caliber does not directly relate to anti-tank ability people, jesus christ


Unless you fire HE shells.

Why have you added that picture with whiny nazi to your post? :D
10 Jul 2015, 12:23 PM
#31
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1


Unless you fire HE shells.

Why have you added that picture with whiny nazi to your post? :D


Superior German Facepalm technology obviously
10 Jul 2015, 12:35 PM
#32
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



In game caliber doesn't translate directly into anti tank ability either so.....

Congratulations, you understood the point!

Now reward yourself with a cookie.

Eat it in front of Cardboard Tank while looking him in the eyes since he deserves punishment for not getting it.
10 Jul 2015, 12:38 PM
#33
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jul 2015, 12:35 PMKatitof

Congratulations, you understood the point!

Now reward yourself with a cookie.

Eat it in front of Cardboard Tank while looking him in the eyes since he deserves punishment for not getting it.


I'll save it to eat during the tournament (my first with the clan) today, get hype!
10 Jul 2015, 13:01 PM
#34
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jul 2015, 12:35 PMKatitof
Eat it in front of Cardboard Tank while looking him in the eyes since he deserves punishment for not getting it.
Are you fucking retarded? I never said that the caliber equals penetration. The 88mm is bigger - it´s fucking 6,25 meters long. Barrel length is what gives increased penetration.

But you are Katitof, the forum jerk.
10 Jul 2015, 13:08 PM
#35
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

Are you fucking retarded? I never said that the caliber equals penetration. The 88mm is bigger - it´s fucking 6,25 meters long. Barrel length is what gives increased penetration.

But you are Katitof, the forum jerk.


You still aren't getting the point though. He's not talking about caliber vs. Caliber or anything of the sort. He is talking about in game units being balanced around their intended role ingame, not their historical usage and certainly not their specs.

Coh2 can't afford to balance realistically because there aren't nearly enough units.

In real life for example, the soviets had enormous at superiority with their b5 at gun, su, and isu series tank assault guns. They had such overwhelming numbers as well that the German military had a hard time holding them back. However, ingame, the soviets are reliant on su85's and t34/85s. As a result, both these tanks are performing differently compared to how they were in real life. Even though they have the exact same gun.
10 Jul 2015, 13:36 PM
#36
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1


Unless you fire HE shells.

Why have you added that picture with whiny nazi to your post? :D


Wehrmacht equals SS (Nazi).
10 Jul 2015, 13:42 PM
#37
avatar of Hawking

Posts: 113

I'm glad Relic is making good changes, mostly. If this is the start of a new trend, I'll be happy. If not, then, well, shit, back to the hole I've been digging for months where I can be alone and cry.
1 like = 1 prayer for VonIvan's sanity.
10 Jul 2015, 17:03 PM
#38
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2


Just wait until we see the actual balance, then you can complain all you want. The whole point of the alpha was mainly bug fixes and design ideas, not balance.


This is what we all hope for.
12 Jul 2015, 22:53 PM
#39
avatar of Bastables

Posts: 20

Are you fucking retarded? I never said that the caliber equals penetration. The 88mm is bigger - it´s fucking 6,25 meters long. Barrel length is what gives increased penetration.

But you are Katitof, the forum jerk.


Which is why every one is using .50 calibre cartridges just in 10metre long barrels . . . .

It's also why the Yamato is famous with it's 20 metre long 5cm guns....
12 Jul 2015, 22:59 PM
#40
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978



Which is why every one is using .50 calibre cartridges just in 10metre long barrels . . . .

It's also why the Yamato is famous with it's 20 metre long 5cm guns....
Stop trolling. You know exactly what I meant.
0 user is browsing this thread:

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: I would like to join in celebration with the 9% of Coh3 MP players who are getting ALL of the new maps. Woohoo! #3Tards
Last Friday, 19:22 PM
OKSpitfire: I hope that at least one of heavies is a like-for-like reskin of the coh 2 ISU-152. I miss that thing.
Last Friday, 10:23 AM
Rosbone: Buy our cool new large tanks that will never get played on the 4 new 1v1 maps added. Perfect synergy! :facepalm:
Last Thursday, 19:23 PM
Rosbone: Everyone ready for some deep penetration :snfPeter:
Last Thursday, 17:13 PM
Lady Xenarra: I'm sure the ppl who defended it as balanced for Allies will be screaming like they got scaled with boiling water, in COH3. How the tables turn.
Last Thursday, 11:33 AM
Willy Pete: I think it was nuts with any engine damage. Especially on superheavies
Last Thursday, 07:03 AM
aerafield: Personally I think without the ram ability, it's worse than loiters for example
Last Thursday, 00:09 AM
Willy Pete: It combined well with most slowing abilities, not just ram stuns
Last Wednesday, 23:36 PM
Willy Pete: Only??? I think not being able to shoot it down and the ramp up effect also had something to do with it
Last Wednesday, 23:34 PM
Willy Pete: Really
Last Wednesday, 23:30 PM
aerafield: AT overwatch was broken only because it came with the faction of T34 ramming
Last Wednesday, 22:29 PM
Willy Pete: Love to see Relic really learning from their past mistakes. Let's bring back the dumbest ability in coh2, and charge money for it
Last Wednesday, 20:34 PM
Willy Pete: New DAK commander will have AT overwatch as alternate choice to elefant
Last Wednesday, 20:33 PM
aaa: Funy thing new players dont know that. And are trying to compete vs hacks
Last Wednesday, 10:33 AM
aaa: Online gaming is trash in general, not just coh. On high level there are all cheats in most games
Last Wednesday, 10:24 AM
aaa: 2 cheaters in 3 days. MH and DH
Last Wednesday, 09:57 AM
aerafield: I am a simple man, I build Humvees with Pathfinders and Missile Launchers inside, I am happy
Last Tuesday, 20:57 PM
Lady Xenarra: aerafield lamevee spammer confirmed :nahnah:
Last Tuesday, 20:42 PM
aerafield: those who know, know: https://www.reddit.com/r/CompanyOfHeroes/s/fPk4yLIgmK
Last Tuesday, 15:40 PM
adamírcz: Might be onto somethin here, combine side armour existing, maps where flanking is a viable option, and hopefully also heavies actually being less manouverable than mediums (lookin at you coh2), and it might be fun gameplay
17 Feb 2025, 13:39 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

431 users are online: 431 guests
1 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51937
Welcome our newest member, sckoolorg
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM