Login

russian armor

T-34 needs a buff

PAGES (20)down
9 Jun 2015, 17:37 PM
#141
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

How about giving it capture territory ability at vet 0?
Or make it possible to put one squad of infantry on it - like in reality 5-6 men would sit and ride on it - they were called somehow I don;t remeber now?
9 Jun 2015, 19:25 PM
#142
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

Then make the 34/76 25 fuel more and make it perform like the tank that it was, the tank that was copied (quite literally with one prototype) to create the Panther. This unit does not need cost decreases, it does not need to go back to old stats, it needs a new lease on life lol. Just like some units that IF alpha tested changes come true to life, will shock the foundations of the "intended role" ideas. Guess the SU76 intended role was to be a target. If it means more fuel cost so be it, but the current state units available on tier 3 and 4 is why the soviets rarley tech unless for Kats or T70.


Making the T34 variants Tank Hunters with no anti infantry power like the Panther would actually be really cool, but would require some testing.

Wrong, they have same AoE radius, but P4 got much better AoE profile and much less distance scatter.


Not really, the differences are really really small:


Name:
Kwk40 75mm Tank Gun (Panzer IV)
File name:
panzer_4_75mm_mp.xml
Nation:
ostheer
Penetration:
120.0/110.0/100.0
Scatter angle:
7.5
Scatter distance:
6.4
AoE radius:
2.5
AoE far:
1.875
AoE mid:
1.25
AoE near:
0.75



Name:
f34 76mm T-34 Gun
File name:
t34_76mm_mp.xml
Nation:
soviet
Penetration:
120.0/100.0/80.0
Scatter angle:
7.5
Scatter distance:
6.9
AoE radius:
2.5
AoE far:
1.875
AoE mid:
1.25
AoE near:
0.625
9 Jun 2015, 19:38 PM
#143
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

Or make it possible to put one squad of infantry on it - like in reality 5-6 men would sit and ride on it - they were called somehow I don;t remeber now?

I believe the transliteration is tankovyy desant.

That probably wouldn't happen since tanks are balanced around not being transports, while transports are balanced around being transports...though unlike being inside a transport, the infantry getting ferried by a tank could be not covered from fire/be far more vulnerable to damage in an attempt to balance it out.
9 Jun 2015, 19:40 PM
#144
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

what damage those tanks inflict at FAR MED and Close?
9 Jun 2015, 19:46 PM
#145
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

9 Jun 2015, 19:51 PM
#146
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

what damage those tanks inflict at FAR MED and Close?

If you mean AOE damage from the gun - it's looks very similar, the only difference is that panzer have 160 damage for distance 12, T-34/76 for 10, than both have 54 dmg for range 24 and 8 for 30-40. All the difference against infantry is in much better hull mg and optional top mg from panzer, witch is better than any hull or coaxial mg.
9 Jun 2015, 20:52 PM
#147
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
Then make the 34/76 25 fuel more and make it perform like the tank that it was, the tank that was copied (quite literally with one prototype) to create the Panther.

So a cheap piece of garbage?

The only thing the panther and t34 share are a sloped frontal plate.
9 Jun 2015, 21:20 PM
#148
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354


So a cheap piece of garbage?

The only thing the panther and t34 share are a sloped frontal plate.

Yes it was cheap - and it isn't bad thing, it, a actually - good. And it wasn't garbage for mass produced battle tank, cause good tank isn't only gun and armour, it's also production and service.

It's only one thing, if you absolve it from outside. Just look at prototypes from Daimler-Benz. In inside - it has same line-up for engine-transmission cell and leading rollers, torsion bar suspension, large rollers, Daimler-Benz one even had diesel engine. MAN variant was harder to produced, but was more traditional for "German" school. It doesn't mean that Germans just copy T-34, they studied it used it benefits.
9 Jun 2015, 21:26 PM
#149
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

I dont understand you people, you whine that soviets call ins are op and want it nerf but you dont want stock units buffed?
9 Jun 2015, 21:31 PM
#150
avatar of Zyllen

Posts: 770

I dont understand you people, you whine that soviets call ins are op and want it nerf but you dont want stock units buffed?


Their is nothing wrong with the t-34 however.

My focus would be on the su85 and su76
9 Jun 2015, 21:37 PM
#151
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 21:31 PMZyllen


Their is nothing wrong with the t-34 however.

My focus would be on the su85 and su76


dayum son, where did you find this?

su85 are fine when used in formations, not spammed one being a feet away from the another and su76m's are going to get a fix soon

but t-34 sure have problems
9 Jun 2015, 21:39 PM
#152
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 21:31 PMZyllen

My focus would be on the su85 and su76

It seems, that you didn't play beta, buffing some units and other changes - chmm...NDA, made T-34 even more irrelevant.
9 Jun 2015, 21:40 PM
#153
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 21:20 PMnewvan

Yes it was cheap - and it isn't bad thing, it, a actually - good. And it wasn't garbage for mass produced battle tank, cause good tank isn't only gun and armour, it's also production and service.

It's only one thing, if you absolve it from outside. Just look at prototypes from Daimler-Benz. In inside - it has same line-up for engine-transmission cell and leading rollers, torsion bar suspension, large rollers, Daimler-Benz one even had diesel engine. MAN variant was harder to produced, but was more traditional for "German" school.

No the only reason people praise the t34 is because the soviet industry and economy could mass produce anything they wanted. Guarantee that if germany was the one to make the t34/76 and could only produce maybe 12-15 thousand of them we would call them idiots for making such a shit tank. Anything is good if you can make enough of them. I mean 48,000 of the 55,000 t34s made were destroyed. Not a good tank, was shit. t34/85 is the only good tank there.
9 Jun 2015, 21:44 PM
#154
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 21:31 PMZyllen


Their is nothing wrong with the t-34 however.

My focus would be on the su85 and su76
you dont play this game much do you?
9 Jun 2015, 21:46 PM
#155
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760


No the only reason people praise the t34 is because the soviet industry and economy could mass produce anything they wanted. Guarantee that if germany was the one to make the t34/76 and could only produce maybe 12-15 thousand of them we would call them idiots for making such a shit tank. Anything is good if you can make enough of them. I mean 48,000 of the 55,000 t34s made were destroyed. Not a good tank, was shit. t34/85 is the only good tank there.
where did you pull those numbers from? That doesnt even make any sense
9 Jun 2015, 21:49 PM
#156
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670


No the only reason people praise the t34 is because the soviet industry and economy could mass produce anything they wanted. Guarantee that if germany was the one to make the t34/76 and could only produce maybe 12-15 thousand of them we would call them idiots for making such a shit tank. Anything is good if you can make enough of them. I mean 48,000 of the 55,000 t34s made were destroyed. Not a good tank, was shit. t34/85 is the only good tank there.


high kek

t34 were praised for its original design back in 1941, where they were excellent versus panzer 3s and short barreled panzer 4s

its design was revolutionary, but you just had to compare it to its relevance in 1944 and power of panthers
9 Jun 2015, 22:03 PM
#157
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned


high kek

t34 were praised for its original design back in 1941, where they were excellent versus panzer 3s and short barreled panzer 4s

its design was revolutionary, but you just had to compare it to its relevance in 1944 and power of panthers
Thats what everyone in this thread is doing, dunno if you noticed but mulriplayer in coh is 1944-45, people are acting like t34/76s should be superior to the panzer4s.
9 Jun 2015, 22:12 PM
#158
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670

Thats what everyone in this thread is doing, dunno if you noticed but mulriplayer in coh is 1944-45, people are acting like t34/76s should be superior to the panzer4s.


they should not, but once again, if they are in the game they have the right to not be complete shit

alex's idea was actually pretty neat, as it solves both problems of t34, it sucks versus tanks cuz low pen and crushes infantry better than shoots them. its a life failure in this game and if it had a father he would be ashamed and t34/85 would get all the candies
9 Jun 2015, 22:12 PM
#159
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354


No the only reason people praise the t34 is because the soviet industry and economy could mass produce anything they wanted. Guarantee that if germany was the one to make the t34/76 and could only produce maybe 12-15 thousand of them we would call them idiots for making such a shit tank. Anything is good if you can make enough of them. I mean 48,000 of the 55,000 t34s made were destroyed. Not a good tank, was shit. t34/85 is the only good tank there.

You do realize that the only difference of T-34/85 from T-34/76 is turret and turret ring? Production of Т-34/76 begun in 1940 it was very innovative tank of this period, there was the need for better gun, fully cast turret, diesel engine for cold winter, cheap and simple suspension, sloped armour, even small details like turret rotation lever

It,s two in one - electric and manual, all other tanks have 2 separate levers, even Tiger. Of course it has flows, like one of the most important - lack of communication systems, cause poor production of them, or very a small area for driver and other things. The mass production of T-34/76 is connected to the adjusted production cycle, you need time and resources to change it, and in the long war you need a constant flow of new tanks, because they will die/break/abandon after retreat, no matter how "good" or expensive they are.

people are acting like t34/76s should be superior to the panzer4s.

Were? Could you tipe the number of post that says that T-34/76 must be better than Panzer IV, all I see - that people wont a role for this tank, so it could be valid choice.

And it was 35312 - T-34/76 and 21048 - T-34/85 produced until 1945.
9 Jun 2015, 22:34 PM
#160
avatar of Switzerland
Donator 33

Posts: 545

Daspoulos has never opened a history book that wasn't biased, if at all apparently. The T34 was only reliably killed by the 88 until the heavier Panzers were developed to kill it. The long barreled Panzer 4 still had to close to a range it could hit back, also that by the time of the long barreled variants appearance, the Russians were firing back with the 85mm.

The T34 wasn't just good because it was mass produced, It was successful as it didn't get stuck in mud, didn't light on fire by moving even early in its production, didn't freeze up in the climates the invading Nazi Germany found itself in, and yes was also very easy to put together and was a damn good machine (which as much as it makes you red in the face the Nazi's saw that). Just as if production of the Panzer 4 late variants or Panther would have seen the Nazis off much better than wasting so much time and effort on tanks that equated to the production time of 4 of the less complicated Panzers. Hell someone even posted the prototype i mentioned, its a T34 drawn by German designer lol.

I think History speaks for itself, especially when the Germans developed new tanks in direct response to the "shit" T34/76.

Thanks for the usual derail Daspoulos back to topic, 76 would be fine in a more AT intensive role to encourage its use, with a fuel increase to bring that in line. As has been mentioned here, bitching about call in Meta and refusing to even hear of buffs for non doc units is pretty dumb when its the lack of good solid stock units that is the root of the issue.
PAGES (20)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

799 users are online: 799 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM