Tanks
Posts: 3787
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1042
Posts: 3787
Buy spotting scopes upgrade then.
i mean without upgrade
Posts: 978
So, not a good idea.
Posts: 3787
That would make AT-guns significantly less effective, because nobody would drive into their line of fire/ or just slightly into it being able to retreat immediately.
So, not a good idea.
AT-guns should have more line of sight as well
Posts: 978
Well ,then both units would look at each other. The point is that AT-guns have 60 range. If the view distance went up from 40 to 50 range units, your tank will be into the AT-guns arc of fire by 10 units seeing the AT-gun, and not 20 units and you can escape more easily.
AT-guns should have more line of sight as well
Posts: 1571
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 175
Posts: 2053
Posts: 935
Thats why I don't understand why pios now have advanced vision and Volks with wet 4 it is just poor design
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
i want all tanks to have a 90 degree LoS like the jpIV by default and top gunners can make it a full 360.
That would be interesting to see.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
8 Posts: 2470
That would be interesting to see.
i figure it would make tank rushes more risky and flanks more rewarding. right now you've got 40 sight in 360 degrees so you're basically safe from anything except an AT gun and if you're paying attention (and assuming pathing doesn't fuck up) you'll never get hit by more than one or two shots per AT gun. if tanks couldn't see behind you could even sneak infantry up on them to satchel or AT nade.
Posts: 1162
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
Posts: 304
i want all tanks to have a 90 degree LoS like the jpIV by default and top gunners can make it a full 360.
In reality what was the vision like for tanks to see behind them? I'm talking without someone up top of course.
I imagine they had rear vision slits/periscopes of some kind at least?
It would certainly make things interesting if they couldn't see behind them at all.
Posts: 5
i want all tanks to have a 90 degree LoS like the jpIV by default and top gunners can make it a full 360.
Oooh, this would make tank dives a lot more punishing, not being able to see behind them when they are unsupported. I think even 180* LoS would be interesting.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Right now is just a interesting idea on paper, that would probably fail on the execution.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
Livestreams
 |
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
37 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.624225.735+2
- 5.920405.694+4
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, 88clbblive
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM