If at all the T-34/76 needs a price reduction. No performance buff. As it is it can handle infantry (4men squads). If it got a faster reload or better accuracy it would mow those squads down. The T-34/76 suffered from poor accuracy, poor vision and an overwhelmed commander who had to fulfill several tasks at once.
The T-34 should be about numbers, not quality.
Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs
23 May 2015, 13:15 PM
#101
Posts: 978
23 May 2015, 17:40 PM
#105
14 
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Post #103 invised for excessive flaming. Post #104 also invised, for citing the defamatory comments.
I can only repeat ad nauseam:if you see a post which you consider you have to report, do not cite the wording in your reply, otherwise if the offensive post is invised, so too will be your response.
Back to topic
I can only repeat ad nauseam:if you see a post which you consider you have to report, do not cite the wording in your reply, otherwise if the offensive post is invised, so too will be your response.
Back to topic
23 May 2015, 23:31 PM
#106
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedIMO considering next patch. I really think the t34 would be great at 80-90 fuel. Its not supposed to be on par with the panzer4, but right now its too expensive for what it does. But make it any cheaper and t34 rushes become too good. Soviets should have always had the option to easily amass t34 tanks but they just don't get that option. Would be great fun if they could imo.
Also I would like to add that I think the panzer4s pen is too low, should be raised from 110 to 130. Would help it out a bit vs call in mediums that just stomp it despite being only 20 fuel more, as well as ever so slightly make it better vs is2. Minor tweak, would be especially warranted if t34 gets it price decrease. Imo would improve medium tank balance quite a bit.
Also I would like to add that I think the panzer4s pen is too low, should be raised from 110 to 130. Would help it out a bit vs call in mediums that just stomp it despite being only 20 fuel more, as well as ever so slightly make it better vs is2. Minor tweak, would be especially warranted if t34 gets it price decrease. Imo would improve medium tank balance quite a bit.
1337 h4X0R, dank memes
axis
23 May 2015, 23:33 PM
#107
Posts: 978
Its not supposed to be on par with the panzer4Careful or that nutcase is coming back again screaming "zomg nazi!".
24 May 2015, 04:31 AM
#108
Posts: 403
Well u can even say same thing about cons rifle versus King tiger rear armor if u want...
Why did you bring up Cons in a small talk about Panzer 4 bounceing off the back of IS2/T-34/76s bouncing off the back of Tigers and King Tigers?
Why?
Major Conscript user.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
24 May 2015, 19:17 PM
#109
8 Posts: 2470
hyperbole
25 May 2015, 07:38 AM
#110
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
@Cardboard and @daspoulos I don't think you really want T34 to be cheaper or a change that will allow players to build more T34s than now. Having in view the moment it can hit the field, it's a problem allready for any axis faction. If you know what to do, it can hit the field realy fast and mess all oponents lines for a few minutes.
I don't know why T34 is considered to be so weak. I play no soviet game without it.
I don't know why T34 is considered to be so weak. I play no soviet game without it.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
25 May 2015, 07:49 AM
#111
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
@Cardboard and @daspoulos I don't think you really want T34 to be cheaper or a change that will allow players to build more T34s than now. Having in view the moment it can hit the field, it's a problem allready for any axis faction. If you know what to do, it can hit the field realy fast and mess all oponents lines for a few minutes.
Its worst tank in game which is hardcountered by cheaper units. Its unable to fight anything on its own unless its infantry with no AT or it have numerical advantage.
There is no reason NOT to make it cheaper in the contrast of sherman and its performance and price.
I don't know why T34 is considered to be so weak.
I play no soviet game without it.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
25 May 2015, 07:52 AM
#112
Posts: 1063
Currently, unless you play Industry, there is no reason to choose T-34/76. Frankly, the HT is the only redeeming features for T3, T4 is much more reliable.
25 May 2015, 07:54 AM
#113
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Its worst tank in game which is hardcountered by cheaper units. Its unable to fight anything on its own unless its infantry with no AT or it have numerical advantage.
There is no reason NOT to make it cheaper in the contrast of sherman and its performance and price.
"Hardcountered". Lol. I like how you use words that you have no clue what they mean. I am not the one willing to enlighten you, I'll just let you crawl in the darkness and have fun all the way while crying rivers of tears about how weak are the soviets and their tools. Even trying to argue against such foolish claims is not worth it.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
25 May 2015, 08:13 AM
#114
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned"Hypothetically"- say t34/76s come later than they do now, making them 80 fuel would give amassed t34/76s viability because they become more affordable at the cost of early t34 rushes. I hardly think the unit needs much changing as far as performance goes. Just they are too expensive. T34/76s should not feel expensive. They are the one of the only, if not the only tank that should be spammed.
1337 h4X0R, dank memes
axis
25 May 2015, 08:17 AM
#115
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Well, daspoulos, what would be a good idea is one thing, that relic will do is another.
They usually mix good idea with two terrible ones.
They usually mix good idea with two terrible ones.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
25 May 2015, 08:21 AM
#116
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedWell, daspoulos, what would be a good idea is one thing, that relic will do is another.
They usually mix good idea with two terrible ones.
Sure is fun trying to craft the perfect balance solutions here on the forum, only for it to mean jack shit when you put it into perspective.
1337 h4X0R, dank memes
axis
25 May 2015, 08:24 AM
#117
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Sure is fun trying to craft the perfect balance solutions here on the forum, only for it to mean jack shit when you put it into perspective.
Yup. Only so much to discuss here, thats why I'm not engaged as much here except utter bs some people spit out.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
25 May 2015, 08:54 AM
#118
Posts: 710
One post invised for sharing something that is not meant to be shared to greater audience.
10 Jun 2015, 12:55 PM
#119
Posts: 1351
Maybe once every second tank they shoud come in pairs ? 
(09.10.2019): "You really are a jewel to this forum" - feels proud, thank You
(24.03.2020): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9PiqCeLEmM
(25.06.2020): http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198035553470/standings
10 Jun 2015, 13:00 PM
#120
Posts: 1617
Maybe once every second tank they shoud come in pairs ?
Buff it's reload speed and add soviet war machine to T0. Fixed.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
595 | ||
 |
|
|
11 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1000
Board Info
329 users are online:
329 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48727
Welcome our newest member, sunwinctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, sunwinctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM