T-34 is garbage against infantry
What did you smoke? It surely was good stuff.
Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs
21 May 2015, 05:32 AM
#81
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
What did you smoke? It surely was good stuff.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
21 May 2015, 09:56 AM
#82
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Alot better than Panther.
T34 being better then Panther in AI.
Yea, it is a gold medal here.
Competition is still para Olympics though.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
21 May 2015, 13:52 PM
#83
Posts: 262
T34 being better then Panther in AI.
Yea, it is a gold medal here.
Competition is still para Olympics though.
Well, he went full retard and said that t34 cant do shit against infantry, and that isn't true, and i said it is alot better than panther (which is true) and i got a reply "ha dont be stupid, stupid".
Makes you wonder...
In hoc signo vinces!
21 May 2015, 13:53 PM
#84
Posts: 1484
What did you smoke? It surely was good stuff.
My dealer says the samething. Compare T-34 vs Sherman (high explosive shell) and P4 Mg-42 gunner than ya T-34 is garbage against infantry.
 |
Playercard of WingZero |
|||||||||||||||
|
21 May 2015, 14:09 PM
#85
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
My dealer says the samething. Compare T-34 vs Sherman (high explosive shell) and P4 Mg-42 gunner than ya T-34 is garbage against infantry.
Well, then I must have just dreamed about my squads being one-shoted by T34 I guess, it never happened... like at least once per game.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
21 May 2015, 14:31 PM
#86
Posts: 1484
Well, then I must have just dreamed about my squads being one-shoted by T34 I guess, it never happened... like at least once per game.
Sucks for you. You should've sacrificed a goat for the RNG Gods.
|
Playercard of WingZero |
|||||||||||||||
|
21 May 2015, 16:33 PM
#87
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Well, then I must have just dreamed about my squads being one-shoted by T34 I guess, it never happened... like at least once per game.
Meanwhile the MG sucks, the RoF is slow and it misses the other 9/10 of it's shots.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
22 May 2015, 05:25 AM
#88
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
I don't know guys but for me T34 is performing at least as well as the shermann when it comes to AI. Shermann without HE shells of course.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
22 May 2015, 13:50 PM
#89
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
@JohnnyB
Lower RoF, lower AoE, worse scatter, worse MGs.
You saying AP rounds doesn't really mean much here, because AP rounds sherman performs terribly against inf.
Most of players here are mature(at least physically), keep the fairy tales for kids.
Lower RoF, lower AoE, worse scatter, worse MGs.
You saying AP rounds doesn't really mean much here, because AP rounds sherman performs terribly against inf.
Most of players here are mature(at least physically), keep the fairy tales for kids.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
22 May 2015, 14:17 PM
#90
Posts: 2742
T34/76 doesn't excel at any particular task and is usually not worth the 100 fuel. That doesn't mean that it can't kill the crap out of infantry units.
I notice that the T34/76 rarely hits infantry while moving, and while it's gun isn't great, it's when the tank is stationary that you will see the best anti-infantry results.
I notice that the T34/76 rarely hits infantry while moving, and while it's gun isn't great, it's when the tank is stationary that you will see the best anti-infantry results.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
22 May 2015, 15:11 PM
#91
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
T34/76 doesn't excel at any particular task and is usually not worth the 100 fuel. That doesn't mean that it can't kill the crap out of infantry units.
It will be useful, then it won't have to hit infantry with threads to kill them. Otherwise, its not really fine or ok and it'll be even worse if it stays that way.
I notice that the T34/76 rarely hits infantry while moving, and while it's gun isn't great, it's when the tank is stationary that you will see the best anti-infantry results.
Which is true for every other tank as well, which happen to be vastly superior to T34/76 in that regard as well, low rof and high scatter in relation to other tanks make it worst AT and AI tank in game and the cost doesn't really portray the disparity accurately.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
22 May 2015, 15:57 PM
#92
Posts: 760
Lol people in this thread saying the t34 is good,obviously you dont play alot of soviets gotta rep the master race
22 May 2015, 17:23 PM
#93
Posts: 692
t34 has its moments if/when it gets vet 2-3, but before that it's pretty weak
Both soviet and wehr tier 3 sucks. I wouldn't mind seeing t4 and call in supertanks delayed 5 more minutes so that both factions' tier 3 has some kind of use
Both soviet and wehr tier 3 sucks. I wouldn't mind seeing t4 and call in supertanks delayed 5 more minutes so that both factions' tier 3 has some kind of use
22 May 2015, 18:11 PM
#94
Posts: 80 | Subs: 1
The worstthing is pz 4 completely unable to penetrate is-2 rear armor....which is absurd.
You could very well use Panzer 4 J's from elite armored with HEAT rounds
23 May 2015, 11:37 AM
#96
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Since when T34 is not good in 1v1 ? O_o
23 May 2015, 12:14 PM
#97
Posts: 403
The worstthing is pz 4 completely unable to penetrate is-2 rear armor....which is absurd.
Same thing could be said of the T-34/76 vs Tigers and King Tigers rear armor.
Major Conscript user.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
23 May 2015, 12:21 PM
#98
Posts: 1225
Since when T34 is not good in 1v1 ? O_o
Its not "bad" per se, same as the PIV, it clearly has a place in the game if you want to consolidate ie. on a strong early game, however, against an opponent that goes full meta ie. strong T1-T2 into Tigers it has a definite expiration date, even 3-4 T34/76s will usually outright fail to take down a properly supported Tiger...PIV has it arguably even worse against IS-2 btw. In other words, its better to transition into call-ins of your own eventually.
23 May 2015, 12:26 PM
#99
Posts: 262
Same thing could be said of the T-34/76 vs Tigers and King Tigers rear armor.
Well u can even say same thing about cons rifle versus King tiger rear armor if u want...
But, t34 is cheaper than pz4 and KT is alot more expensive than IS, so...
But still, i think that t34 is just little underperforming, but i would rather like to stay it as is than Relic try to "fix it" because they will overdue it like every single time when units need tweaking.
And to clarify why i want it to stay as is rather than direct tweaking of unit, is becuase i think unit itself is working good but problem is in call ins.
In hoc signo vinces!
23 May 2015, 12:28 PM
#100
Posts: 262
--Double post--
delete please
delete please
In hoc signo vinces!
0 user is browsing this thread:
SHOUT IT OUT!
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
Last Thursday, 15:46 PM
Last Thursday, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
Last Thursday, 09:34 AM
Last Thursday, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
Last Thursday, 09:32 AM
Last Thursday, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
Last Thursday, 09:30 AM
Last Thursday, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy 
Last Thursday, 04:31 AM
Last Thursday, 04:31 AM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. 
.
Last Monday, 02:46 AM
.Last Monday, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Livestreams
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
57 | ||
 |
|
|
54 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43063.872+8
- 2.56480.876+3
- 3.800454.638-1
- 4.303163.650+3
- 5.313114.733+9
- 6.12744.743+1
- 7.194101.658-1
- 8.282161.637+1
- 9.371284.566-1
- 10.14059.704+7
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1354
Board Info
759 users are online:
759 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53074
Welcome our newest member, Wave357
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Wave357
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM